Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] signoffs are dead

On Tue, 28 Jun 2016 19:28:10 -0700, Kyle Terrien via arch-general wrote:

I have personally experienced several breakages in the past several months--more than usual. A few were big enough that simply running 'foo - --version' should have revealed a problem (i.e. linking problems). A signoff process would have very likely caught these problems.

Could you provide some examples, by linking to the bug reports? Excepted of issues that happen, if upstream decides to make a change of course, as e.g. gtk or qt did, I couldn't notice more issues as usual. Regards, Ralf