On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 8:51 AM, Jeffrey Lynn Parke Jr. <jeffrey.parke@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 10:15 PM, Nilesh Govindarajan <lists@itech7.com>wrote:
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 8:34 AM, Jeffrey Lynn Parke Jr. <jeffrey.parke@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 10:03 PM, Nilesh Govindarajan <lists@itech7.com wrote:
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 8:26 AM, Matthew Monaco <dgbaley27@verizon.net> wrote:
On 05/30/2010 10:53 PM, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
Hi,
In order to improve firefox's reponse time, I'm thinking of compiling firefox with gcc's -O3 and -march settings from the ABS. Any tips on that matter, about updates, etc. ?
Try firefox-pgo. You have to be careful with gcc options when compiling firefox. The AUR's firefox-pgo sets up properly for you.
It seems firefox-pgo is for 64bit, but I am on 32bit. I had put up a thread about upgrading to 64bit, but many suggested that it would not improve the performance much :( Should I compile after upgrading ?
-- Nilesh Govindarajan Facebook: nilesh.gr Twitter: nileshgr Website: www.itech7.com
it should be for both 32 and 64 bit
Hmm, I think so, the compilation should fail if not :) What's about firefox-qt ? Is it worth installing it ?
-- Nilesh Govindarajan Facebook: nilesh.gr Twitter: nileshgr Website: www.itech7.com
that's a firefox port for the qt toolkit, as opposed to the regular gtk one.
I know that, but is it worth installing ? -- Nilesh Govindarajan Facebook: nilesh.gr Twitter: nileshgr Website: www.itech7.com