13 Jun
2016
13 Jun
'16
2:03 a.m.
On 13 June 2016 at 01:31, Levente Polyak <anthraxx@archlinux.org> wrote:
On 06/13/2016 12:59 AM, David C. Rankin wrote:
[...] prevent whip-sawing all arch users who following the recommendation in configuring their desktop from finding out their config is broken on the first reboot after update following removal.
<snip>
I don't say there may be no problems, but bashing like that statement is simply not fair and also not very helpful.
I read his message as "we shouldn't remove it just like that because _that_ would break peoples system/config", and not as "SLiM is broken". -- Maarten