17 Jan
2009
17 Jan
'09
5:46 p.m.
Xavier wrote:
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 6:19 PM, Baho Utot <baho-utot@columbus.rr.com> wrote:
Oh Ok,
The tools are in a broken state until pacman 3.3
Thanks for clearing that up.
To be more correct and polite, let's say the packages are currently in a transition period related to info pages handling, and the tools have no workarounds for making this transition period smoother until 3.3.
Well Ok if you want to be politically correct we will say that. As you may well already know I am _NOT_ politically correct and tend to say what the situation is sans the sugar. Just don't take it badly.