Am Tue, 24 Jul 2012 16:07:50 +0200 schrieb Heiko Baums <lists@baums-on-web.de>:
Btw., in all those discussions about systemd as well as in all those discussions about PulseAudio, I always read more or less technical arguments from people who have objections against them or have tried them and have seen that they don't really work. From the people who like systemd and/or PulseAudio I only read arguments like "it's faster", "it's an evolution", "it's new", "everybody (distribution) uses it", "it has this and that feature", which actually only makes sense and works in a very few cases or can easily be achieved in other ways. But I haven't, yet, read any technical argument for them, why it is technically better, why it doesn't break the UNIX philosophy, why it is reliable enough etc.
Well, now I must correct myself. I just read Tom's explanation about some technical details of systemd. The first one so far, which clarifies it a bit. Heiko