Thomas S Hatch <thatch45@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Grigorios Bouzakis <grbzks@xsmail.com>wrote:
Thomas S Hatch wrote:
I am saving the "include SELINUX support in base for a latter date"
my understanding though is that the stated position of Arch was "no systemd"
s/was/is/g
That is also my understanding in regards to selinux. Although i am not familiar with "stated positions" about either.
PS. Ntp is fine application that will keep your clock synchronised. It seems to be 5 days off. :)
Yes the systemd topic keeps popping up, right now we don't know if certain upstream changes are going to force Arch into using systemd or not.
I dont think such a topic keeps popping up. In fact I dont remember reading a discussion between Arch developers about it, ever. I could probably go on ranting about stuff thats been shoved down users mouths the last years for months but its futile and a waste of time.
As for adding SELinux support in base but keeping it turned off by default, +1
Although this isnt a vote, mine was for no selinux at all, so its just 1. :)