[arch-general] pacman: -Rd remove with no dependency check changed?
Hello, I just wanted to remove and install again some pkg because something screwed.. I run $ sudo pacman -Rd pm-utils checking dependencies... error: failed to prepare transaction (could not satisfy dependencies) :: upower: requires pm-utils AFAIK this was the point of -d (--nodeps) to remove the files without whining about dependencies? Is this a bug? Or how do I achieve the old behavior? Thank you, Mark -- Marek Otahal :o)
-d ignores version numbers -dd versions and names (the old -d)
-d ignores version numbers -dd versions and names (the old -d) Oh, thank you very much Jesse! I already started writing a patch to mention
On Saturday 30 of April 2011 22:12:53 jesse jaara wrote: the -dd then I read the text carefully.. :P But maybe the -dd should be mentioned in the text? (not just "use twice") Cheers, Marek -- Marek Otahal :o)
Am Sat, 30 Apr 2011 22:32:17 +0200
schrieb Marek Otahal
On Saturday 30 of April 2011 22:12:53 jesse jaara wrote:
-d ignores version numbers -dd versions and names (the old -d) Oh, thank you very much Jesse! I already started writing a patch to mention the -dd then I read the text carefully.. :P But maybe the -dd should be mentioned in the text? (not just "use twice") Cheers, Marek
And the -dd should be highlighted. Should be done with any other parameter which can be given twice and which has a different meaning if given twice. This would also reduce bug reports about broken features in the future. And a announcement wouldn't hurt, too. Heiko
Marek Otahal wrote:
Oh, thank you very much Jesse! I already started writing a patch to mention the -dd then I read the text carefully..
Don't bother, its already changed in git. ---- Greg
Marek Otahal wrote:
Oh, thank you very much Jesse! I already started writing a patch to mention the -dd then I read the text carefully..
Don't bother, its already changed in git. Is it? I was checking git://projects.archlinux.org/pacman.git and it's not in
On Sunday 01 of May 2011 00:36:40 Grigorios Bouzakis wrote: the doc/pacman.8.txt
---- Greg
-- Marek Otahal :o)
On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 2:51 AM, Marek Otahal
Marek Otahal wrote:
Oh, thank you very much Jesse! I already started writing a patch to mention the -dd then I read the text carefully..
Don't bother, its already changed in git. Is it? I was checking git://projects.archlinux.org/pacman.git and it's not in
On Sunday 01 of May 2011 00:36:40 Grigorios Bouzakis wrote: the doc/pacman.8.txt
I reported a bug on the -d flag a while ago. I think it's fixed; otherwise the bug should be reopened. --Kaiting. [1]: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/23837 -- Kiwis and Limes: http://kaitocracy.blogspot.com/
Marek Otahal wrote:
On Sunday 01 of May 2011 00:36:40 Grigorios Bouzakis wrote:
Marek Otahal wrote:
Oh, thank you very much Jesse! I already started writing a patch to mention the -dd then I read the text carefully..
Don't bother, its already changed in git. Is it? I was checking git://projects.archlinux.org/pacman.git and it's not in the doc/pacman.8.txt
Check commit e214b260efcba2 Besides Kaiting's report there is also https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/23433 Of course if you're unsatisfied with the changes you can send a patch regardless. ---- Greg
participants (5)
-
Grigorios Bouzakis
-
Heiko Baums
-
jesse jaara
-
Kaiting Chen
-
Marek Otahal