[arch-general] [community] package needs rebuilding, bug report?
Hi all, With the move of [gnome-unstable] stuff to [testing], some [community] packages (gnome-media-pulse, gnome-settings-daemon-pulse) are out-of-date, others (xiphos) no longer run due to depending on earlier versions of libs. Is that bug-report worthy, or can I assume the maintainers are aware?
On 10/01/2010 01:37 AM, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
Hi all,
With the move of [gnome-unstable] stuff to [testing], some [community] packages (gnome-media-pulse, gnome-settings-daemon-pulse) are out-of-date, others (xiphos) no longer run due to depending on earlier versions of libs. Is that bug-report worthy, or can I assume the maintainers are aware?
On Fri, 2010-10-01 at 01:40 +0300, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
On 10/01/2010 01:37 AM, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
Hi all,
With the move of [gnome-unstable] stuff to [testing], some [community] packages (gnome-media-pulse, gnome-settings-daemon-pulse) are out-of-date, others (xiphos) no longer run due to depending on earlier versions of libs. Is that bug-report worthy, or can I assume the maintainers are aware?
Thanks wonder. So can I assume lib-related-rebuilds should be bug-reported?
On 10/01/2010 02:27 AM, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
On Fri, 2010-10-01 at 01:40 +0300, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
On 10/01/2010 01:37 AM, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
Hi all,
With the move of [gnome-unstable] stuff to [testing], some [community] packages (gnome-media-pulse, gnome-settings-daemon-pulse) are out-of-date, others (xiphos) no longer run due to depending on earlier versions of libs. Is that bug-report worthy, or can I assume the maintainers are aware?
Thanks wonder. So can I assume lib-related-rebuilds should be bug-reported?
definitely -- Ionuț
participants (2)
-
Ionuț Bîru
-
Ng Oon-Ee