[arch-general] gnupg: requires readline>=6.0.00
readline 6 is still in testing but gnupg is in extra's maybe I just need to wait? is readline 6 about to move to extra's? extra/gnupg 1.4.9-4 GNU Privacy Guard - a PGP replacement tool -- Caleb Cushing http://xenoterracide.blogspot.com
Caleb Cushing schrieb:
readline 6 is still in testing but gnupg is in extra's maybe I just need to wait? is readline 6 about to move to extra's?
extra/gnupg 1.4.9-4 GNU Privacy Guard - a PGP replacement tool
Hello, readline 6.0.00 is in [core] now, not in [extra]. Maybe your mirror has not synced yet. Regards Stefan
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 9:41 AM, Stefan Husmann<stefan-husmann@t-online.de> wrote:
readline 6.0.00 is in [core] now, not in [extra]. Maybe your mirror has not synced yet.
ok. core is still showing as 'up to date' for me so I'll just have to wait for that to resolve itself. -- Caleb Cushing http://xenoterracide.blogspot.com
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 9:47 AM, Caleb Cushing<xenoterracide@gmail.com> wrote:
ok. core is still showing as 'up to date' for me so I'll just have to wait for that to resolve itself.
this is annoying... core still isn't showing as not being up to date.... do the 'repo' updates come from the mirror I use to get packages from or elsewhere? -- Caleb Cushing http://xenoterracide.blogspot.com
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 4:38 PM, Caleb Cushing<xenoterracide@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 9:47 AM, Caleb Cushing<xenoterracide@gmail.com> wrote:
ok. core is still showing as 'up to date' for me so I'll just have to wait for that to resolve itself.
this is annoying... core still isn't showing as not being up to date.... do the 'repo' updates come from the mirror I use to get packages from or elsewhere?
The DB files come from the same place as the packages. I wonder if your mirror updates extra more often than core... Which mirror are you using?
Which mirror are you using?
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 5:42 PM, Aaron Griffin<aaronmgriffin@gmail.com> wrote: primarily Server = ftp://mirror.cs.vt.edu/pub/ArchLinux/$repo/os/x86_64 although I've got a lot of failovers. -- Caleb Cushing http://xenoterracide.blogspot.com
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 8:13 PM, Caleb Cushing<xenoterracide@gmail.com> wrote:
Which mirror are you using?
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 5:42 PM, Aaron Griffin<aaronmgriffin@gmail.com> wrote: primarily
Server = ftp://mirror.cs.vt.edu/pub/ArchLinux/$repo/os/x86_64
this server still have readline-5.2.013-2-x86_64.pkg.tar.gz in core. Try using another mirror.
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 8:25 PM, Eric Bélanger <snowmaniscool@gmail.com>wrote:
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 8:13 PM, Caleb Cushing<xenoterracide@gmail.com> wrote:
Which mirror are you using?
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 5:42 PM, Aaron Griffin<aaronmgriffin@gmail.com> wrote: primarily
Server = ftp://mirror.cs.vt.edu/pub/ArchLinux/$repo/os/x86_64
this server still have readline-5.2.013-2-x86_64.pkg.tar.gz in core.
Try using another mirror.
This mirror does, in fact, seem to update different repos on different schedules.
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 8:53 PM, Ray Kohler<ataraxia@cmu.edu> wrote:
This mirror does, in fact, seem to update different repos on different schedules.
highly annoying... I made unixheads my primary mirror for now... seems to have resolved it. -- Caleb Cushing http://xenoterracide.blogspot.com
Caleb Cushing schrieb:
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 9:47 AM, Caleb Cushing<xenoterracide@gmail.com> wrote:
ok. core is still showing as 'up to date' for me so I'll just have to wait for that to resolve itself.
this is annoying... core still isn't showing as not being up to date.... do the 'repo' updates come from the mirror I use to get packages from or elsewhere?
Tried pacman -Syy?
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 5:43 PM, Thomas Bächler<thomas@archlinux.org> wrote:
Tried pacman -Syy
just did. no help. -- Caleb Cushing http://xenoterracide.blogspot.com
participants (6)
-
Aaron Griffin
-
Caleb Cushing
-
Eric Bélanger
-
Ray Kohler
-
Stefan Husmann
-
Thomas Bächler