[arch-general] perl 5.12.1-3? not 5.12.2-1?
I'm just a bit curious on this, why release a -3 when upstream released a new ABI compatible (as far as I know) release over a month ago, that isn't yet in repo. -- Caleb Cushing http://xenoterracide.com
On 11/02/2010 03:05 PM, Caleb Cushing wrote:
I'm just a bit curious on this, why release a -3 when upstream released a new ABI compatible (as far as I know) release over a month ago, that isn't yet in repo.
lets see. http://repos.archlinux.org/wsvn/packages/perl/trunk/ upgpkg: perl 5.12.1-3 db-5.1 rebuild -- Ionuț
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 8:14 AM, Ionuț Bîru <ibiru@archlinux.org> wrote:
lets see. http://repos.archlinux.org/wsvn/packages/perl/trunk/
that explains a version bump, not why perl wasn't upgraded at the same time, if you've gotta rebuild perl might as well make it current. it's not like this is 5.14 and it'll break everything again. -- Caleb Cushing http://xenoterracide.com
On 02/11/10 23:18, Caleb Cushing wrote:
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 8:14 AM, Ionuț Bîru<ibiru@archlinux.org> wrote:
lets see. http://repos.archlinux.org/wsvn/packages/perl/trunk/
that explains a version bump, not why perl wasn't upgraded at the same time, if you've gotta rebuild perl might as well make it current. it's not like this is 5.14 and it'll break everything again.
I do not maintain perl so I was doing nothing more than a simple rebuild. Updating a package when you know nothing about it is usually not a good idea... Allan
participants (3)
-
Allan McRae
-
Caleb Cushing
-
Ionuț Bîru