Any reasons?
Am 01.05.2016 um 20:40 schrieb Diego Viola:
Any reasons?
Hi,
There is no special reason, the arch maintainers simply don't have enough interest in this project.
You can install it from the AUR, though.
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_User_Repository
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/RetroArch
ProgAndy
On Sun, May 01, 2016 at 03:40:39PM -0300, Diego Viola wrote:
Any reasons?
Probably due to not enough interest in the package. Also, despite the name, RetroArch has nothing whatsoever to do with the Arch Linux project. Just thought this might bear mentioning.
On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 9:07 PM, Rob Miller docrobot@riseup.net wrote:
On Sun, May 01, 2016 at 03:40:39PM -0300, Diego Viola wrote:
Any reasons?
Probably due to not enough interest in the package. Also, despite the name, RetroArch has nothing whatsoever to do with the Arch Linux project. Just thought this might bear mentioning.
Just a heads up, I am and have been interested in bringing retroarch into [community] and have had nightly builds going around for a while. Hopefully I'll have the time to do so in a not so distant future.
Cheers, -- Maxime
On Sun, May 01, 2016 at 09:26:20PM +0200, Maxime Gauduin wrote:
On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 9:07 PM, Rob Miller docrobot@riseup.net wrote:
On Sun, May 01, 2016 at 03:40:39PM -0300, Diego Viola wrote:
Any reasons?
Probably due to not enough interest in the package. Also, despite the name, RetroArch has nothing whatsoever to do with the Arch Linux project. Just thought this might bear mentioning.
Just a heads up, I am and have been interested in bringing retroarch into [community] and have had nightly builds going around for a while. Hopefully I'll have the time to do so in a not so distant future.
Cheers,
Maxime
Is it only a matter of time, or are there other things in the way? Anything that people can help with?
On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 9:33 PM, Rob Miller docrobot@riseup.net wrote:
On Sun, May 01, 2016 at 09:26:20PM +0200, Maxime Gauduin wrote:
On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 9:07 PM, Rob Miller docrobot@riseup.net wrote:
On Sun, May 01, 2016 at 03:40:39PM -0300, Diego Viola wrote:
Any reasons?
Probably due to not enough interest in the package. Also, despite the name, RetroArch has nothing whatsoever to do with the Arch Linux project. Just thought this might bear mentioning.
Just a heads up, I am and have been interested in bringing retroarch into [community] and have had nightly builds going around for a while.
Hopefully
I'll have the time to do so in a not so distant future.
Cheers,
Maxime
Is it only a matter of time, or are there other things in the way? Anything that people can help with?
Time only, the build issues I had when I first got into it were fixed in the 1.3 release.
Cheers, -- Maxime
On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 5:29 PM, Maxime Gauduin alucryd@archlinux.org wrote:
On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 9:33 PM, Rob Miller docrobot@riseup.net wrote:
On Sun, May 01, 2016 at 09:26:20PM +0200, Maxime Gauduin wrote:
On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 9:07 PM, Rob Miller docrobot@riseup.net wrote:
On Sun, May 01, 2016 at 03:40:39PM -0300, Diego Viola wrote:
Any reasons?
Probably due to not enough interest in the package. Also, despite the name, RetroArch has nothing whatsoever to do with the Arch Linux project. Just thought this might bear mentioning.
Just a heads up, I am and have been interested in bringing retroarch into [community] and have had nightly builds going around for a while.
Hopefully
I'll have the time to do so in a not so distant future.
Cheers,
Maxime
Is it only a matter of time, or are there other things in the way? Anything that people can help with?
Time only, the build issues I had when I first got into it were fixed in the 1.3 release.
Cheers,
Maxime
Hi Maxime,
Just noticed that RetroArch landed in community, thanks for doing this. :)
Diego
On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 9:28 AM, Diego Viola diego.viola@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 5:29 PM, Maxime Gauduin alucryd@archlinux.org wrote:
On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 9:33 PM, Rob Miller docrobot@riseup.net wrote:
On Sun, May 01, 2016 at 09:26:20PM +0200, Maxime Gauduin wrote:
On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 9:07 PM, Rob Miller docrobot@riseup.net wrote:
On Sun, May 01, 2016 at 03:40:39PM -0300, Diego Viola wrote:
Any reasons?
Probably due to not enough interest in the package. Also, despite the name, RetroArch has nothing whatsoever to do with the Arch Linux project. Just thought this might bear mentioning.
Just a heads up, I am and have been interested in bringing retroarch into [community] and have had nightly builds going around for a while.
Hopefully
I'll have the time to do so in a not so distant future.
Cheers,
Maxime
Is it only a matter of time, or are there other things in the way? Anything that people can help with?
Time only, the build issues I had when I first got into it were fixed in the 1.3 release.
Cheers,
Maxime
Hi Maxime,
Just noticed that RetroArch landed in community, thanks for doing this. :)
Diego
Can someone please help me check the wiki reflects the new package in community?
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/RetroArch
I've already made a small change to reflect to the new package in community, but I don't know if more changes are needed.
Thanks, Diego
arch-general@lists.archlinux.org