Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [RFC] Bluez 5
Hi Tom, Am 13.05.2013 18:02, schrieb Tom Gundersen:
I would like to push Bluez 5 to the repos, and rename Bluez 4 to 'bluez4'. Some things still require Bluez 4, and the two can not be installed together, so this is how I propose to do it.
Any objections?
I'm quite interested in Bluez 5 and would like to have it running as soon as possible ;). Any updates on the progress of your RFC? Do you have a list of applications currently not ready to work with Bluez 5 and still requiring Bluez 4 and its API? Best regards, Karol Babioch
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 9:06 AM, Karol Babioch <karol@babioch.de> wrote:
Hi Tom,
Am 13.05.2013 18:02, schrieb Tom Gundersen:
I would like to push Bluez 5 to the repos, and rename Bluez 4 to 'bluez4'. Some things still require Bluez 4, and the two can not be installed together, so this is how I propose to do it.
Any objections?
I'm quite interested in Bluez 5 and would like to have it running as soon as possible ;). Any updates on the progress of your RFC?
So far no comments, so I'll go ahead with my plan as soon as I find time.
Do you have a list of applications currently not ready to work with Bluez 5 and still requiring Bluez 4 and its API?
I didn't look much into this at all (I'm currently suffering from a bad internet connection, so will get back to this next week), but at least libbluedevil still uses Bluez4. Cheers, Tom
Hi, Am 23.05.2013 07:04, schrieb Tom Gundersen:
So far no comments, so I'll go ahead with my plan as soon as I find time.
The RFC looks good to me, but who am I to tell ;). I basically just want to take advantage of a new BlueZ package, as the current one is quite old now - at least compared to other packages provided by Arch. This is obviously not your fault at all, but at some point in the future the step to BlueZ 5 has to be taken. Best regards, Karol Babioch
participants (2)
-
Karol Babioch
-
Tom Gundersen