[arch-general] Updated PKGBUILD for gmpc
As stated in the thread on outdated PKGBUILD, this is an email with an updated PKGBUILD for gmpc which is 2 releases behind the current one available on the project site. -- slubman site: http://www.slubman.info/
slubman wrote:
As stated in the thread on outdated PKGBUILD, this is an email with an updated PKGBUILD for gmpc which is 2 releases behind the current one available on the project site.
For any dev looking to build this for the repos, it requires a libmpd update which has a soname bump also requiring xfce4-mpc-plugin to be rebuilt. Allan
On Tuesday 07 April 2009 17:40:47 Allan McRae wrote:
slubman wrote:
As stated in the thread on outdated PKGBUILD, this is an email with an updated PKGBUILD for gmpc which is 2 releases behind the current one available on the project site.
For any dev looking to build this for the repos, it requires a libmpd update which has a soname bump also requiring xfce4-mpc-plugin to be rebuilt.
Allan
Attached is the PKGBUILD for libmpd. I use those 2 (and some plugins) for 1 week, without problems. -- slubman site: http://www.slubman.info/
from your pkguild: mv index.php* ./${pkgname}-${pkgver}.tar.gz tar xzf ${pkgname}-${pkgver}.tar.gz why this?! -- Andrea `BaSh` Scarpino Arch Linux Developer
On Tuesday 07 April 2009 18:48:55 Andrea Scarpino wrote:
from your pkguild:
mv index.php* ./${pkgname}-${pkgver}.tar.gz tar xzf ${pkgname}-${pkgver}.tar.gz
why this?!
Forgot to remove this line from previous versions (where there was no direct URL to source tarball) Correct one attached here. -- slubman site: http://www.slubman.info/
2009/4/7 slubman <lists@slubman.info>:
Forgot to remove this line from previous versions (where there was no direct URL to source tarball)
Correct one attached here. also these are useless:
cd ${startdir}/src tar xzf ${pkgname}-${pkgver}.tar.gz -- Andrea `BaSh` Scarpino Arch Linux Developer
On Tuesday 07 April 2009 18:57:03 slubman wrote:
On Tuesday 07 April 2009 18:48:55 Andrea Scarpino wrote:
from your pkguild:
mv index.php* ./${pkgname}-${pkgver}.tar.gz tar xzf ${pkgname}-${pkgver}.tar.gz
why this?!
Forgot to remove this line from previous versions (where there was no direct URL to source tarball)
Correct one attached here.
Reply to self, still some issues in the previous one -- slubman site: http://www.slubman.info/
2009/4/7 slubman <lists@slubman.info>:
Reply to self, still some issues in the previous one
I changed make DESTDIR=$startdir/pkg install to make DESTDIR=${pkgdir} install and pushed libmpd 0.18.0 why you put libsexy as dependence of gmpc? I don't see it in this list[1] [1] http://gmpc.wikia.com/wiki/Installation_Source -- Andrea `BaSh` Scarpino Arch Linux Developer
On Tuesday 07 April 2009 19:06:12 Andrea Scarpino wrote:
2009/4/7 slubman <lists@slubman.info>:
Reply to self, still some issues in the previous one
I changed make DESTDIR=$startdir/pkg install to make DESTDIR=${pkgdir} install and pushed libmpd 0.18.0
why you put libsexy as dependence of gmpc? I don't see it in this list[1]
Because of: ldd $(which gmpc) | grep sexy libsexy.so.2 => /usr/lib/libsexy.so.2 (0x00007fc9f1977000) -- slubman site: http://www.slubman.info/
2009/4/7 slubman <lists@slubman.info>:
Because of:
ldd $(which gmpc) | grep sexy libsexy.so.2 => /usr/lib/libsexy.so.2 (0x00007fc9f1977000)
Do you know what are the vantages of use libsexy? because I built it without and it isn't required: $ ldd $(which gmpc) | grep sexy $ -- Andrea `BaSh` Scarpino Arch Linux Developer
On Tuesday 07 April 2009 19:13:46 Andrea Scarpino wrote:
2009/4/7 slubman <lists@slubman.info>:
Because of:
ldd $(which gmpc) | grep sexy libsexy.so.2 => /usr/lib/libsexy.so.2 (0x00007fc9f1977000)
Do you know what are the vantages of use libsexy? because I built it without and it isn't required: $ ldd $(which gmpc) | grep sexy $
Looking at configure options, looks like libsexy is always used, but there is a bundled one with the source. --enable-system-libsexy Use system libsexy instead of bundles. I don't know what is the best solution, use the bundled one, or the one provided by arch. -- slubman site: http://www.slubman.info/
slubman wrote:
On Tuesday 07 April 2009 19:13:46 Andrea Scarpino wrote:
2009/4/7 slubman <lists@slubman.info>:
Because of:
ldd $(which gmpc) | grep sexy libsexy.so.2 => /usr/lib/libsexy.so.2 (0x00007fc9f1977000)
Do you know what are the vantages of use libsexy? because I built it without and it isn't required: $ ldd $(which gmpc) | grep sexy $
Looking at configure options, looks like libsexy is always used, but there is a bundled one with the source.
--enable-system-libsexy Use system libsexy instead of bundles.
I don't know what is the best solution, use the bundled one, or the one provided by arch.
Using bundled libs are not a good idea. Use bundled in case that are _really_ necessary. -- Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi ( djgera ) http://www.djgera.com.ar KeyID: 0x1B8C330D Key fingerprint = 0CAA D5D4 CD85 4434 A219 76ED 39AB 221B 1B8C 330D
2009/4/7 Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi <vmlinuz386@yahoo.com.ar>:
Using bundled libs are not a good idea. Use bundled in case that are _really_ necessary. Ok, so I added libsexy as dependence in gmpc 0.18.0-2
-- Andrea `BaSh` Scarpino Arch Linux Developer
2009/4/7 Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>:
For any dev looking to build this for the repos, it requires a libmpd update which has a soname bump also requiring xfce4-mpc-plugin to be rebuilt. Thanks Allan, done
-- Andrea `BaSh` Scarpino Arch Linux Developer
participants (4)
-
Allan McRae
-
Andrea Scarpino
-
Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi
-
slubman