Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Samba package sizes
Dan McGee (2010-02-26 19:09):
Guys, does anyone else think this is getting out of hand? <...> Seriously, 45 f-ing MB for samba? How can that be possible? <...>
Samba is growing up fast. It is long known upstream ( http://bugs.debian.org/474543 ) and already anecdotal: http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2009-December/152549.html -- -- Rogutės Sparnuotos
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 11:54 AM, Rogutės Sparnuotos <rogutes@googlemail.com> wrote:
Dan McGee (2010-02-26 19:09):
Guys, does anyone else think this is getting out of hand? <...> Seriously, 45 f-ing MB for samba? How can that be possible? <...>
Samba is growing up fast. It is long known upstream ( http://bugs.debian.org/474543 ) and already anecdotal: http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2009-December/152549.html
I just read the debian bug, it would be interesting to have a status update after one year : 1) there was a big size increase between 3.0 and 3.2 , how does 3.4(.6) compare to that ? 2) whats up with the librpc/gen_ndr "Patches welcome" ?
Am Samstag 27 Februar 2010 schrieb Xavier Chantry:
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 11:54 AM, Rogutės Sparnuotos
<rogutes@googlemail.com> wrote:
Dan McGee (2010-02-26 19:09):
Guys, does anyone else think this is getting out of hand?
<...>
Seriously, 45 f-ing MB for samba? How can that be possible?
<...>
Samba is growing up fast. It is long known upstream ( http://bugs.debian.org/474543 ) and already anecdotal: http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2009-December/152549.html
I just read the debian bug, it would be interesting to have a status update after one year : 1) there was a big size increase between 3.0 and 3.2 , how does 3.4(.6) compare to that ? 2) whats up with the librpc/gen_ndr "Patches welcome" ? Keep in mind 3.5.x will be release on monday, probably. greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tpowa@archlinux.org
participants (3)
-
Rogutės Sparnuotos
-
Tobias Powalowski
-
Xavier Chantry