Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Signoff report for [testing]
On 02/28/2015 10:07 AM, Arch Website Notification wrote:
== Completed signoffs (10 total) ==
* curl-7.41.0-1 (i686) * iproute2-3.19.0-1 (i686) * linux-3.19-1 (i686)
== All packages in [testing] for more than 14 days (11 total) ==
* linux-3.19-1 (i686), since 2015-02-09 * linux-3.19-1 (x86_64), since 2015-02-09
How long does it usually take to move a package to core after completing the signoff? I eagerly await the new linux package. -- Alajos O'Doyle
Hi,
How long does it usually take to move a package to core after completing the signoff? I eagerly await the new linux package.
Maybe we wait for Linux 4.0 ;) -- xmpp bjo@schafweide.org
On 03/06/2015 10:41 AM, Bjoern Franke wrote:
Maybe we wait for Linux 4.0 ;)
Kinda feels like it... ;) Seriously though, are there other packages needed first? What's the reason for holding this back so long? Maybe I don't understand the procedure very well... -- Alajos O'Doyle
Sat, 07 Mar 2015 20:25:13 +0100
Alajos O'Doyle
Seriously though, are there other packages needed first? What's the reason for holding this back so long? Maybe I don't understand the procedure very well...
I went looking through https://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/log/?h=packages/linux and it seems to be a very rare occasion that a (.0)-1 kernel package would get moved to [core] - the last one was 3.12-1. But since 3.19.1 is out now, it's probably just a few more days. --byte
On 03/07/2015 08:42 PM, Jens Adam wrote:
I went looking through https://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/log/?h=packages/linux and it seems to be a very rare occasion that a (.0)-1 kernel package would get moved to [core] - the last one was 3.12-1.
But since 3.19.1 is out now, it's probably just a few more days.
Thanks you, that makes sense. -- Alajos O'Doyle
participants (3)
-
Alajos O'Doyle
-
Bjoern Franke
-
Jens Adam