On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Alexandre Ferrando wrote:

On 25 January 2012 09:25, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:

...

:: Starting full system upgrade... warning: lib32-libxcb: local (1.8-1) is newer than multilib (1.7-3) warning: libxcb: local (1.8-1) is newer than extra (1.7-2) warning: xcb-proto: local (1.7-1) is newer than extra (1.6-2)

I thought it'd just be an outdated mirror or something, but a check on archlinux.org searching for xcb shows that the latter versions are current in the repos. Did something travel backward in time?

Outdated mirror. This was something that got solved in Saturday.

Why would the website show otherwise? http://www.archlinux.org/packages/?q=libxcb It shows 1.7-3 for lib32-libxcb and 1.7-2 for libxcb here for me. Doubt my browser checks for /etc/pacman.d/mirrorlist (hopefully).

On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 4:46 PM, Alexandre Ferrando wrote:

On 25 January 2012 09:41, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:

...

On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Alexandre Ferrando wrote:

...

On 25 January 2012 09:25, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:

...

:: Starting full system upgrade... warning: lib32-libxcb: local (1.8-1) is newer than multilib (1.7-3) warning: libxcb: local (1.8-1) is newer than extra (1.7-2) warning: xcb-proto: local (1.7-1) is newer than extra (1.6-2)

I thought it'd just be an outdated mirror or something, but a check on archlinux.org searching for xcb shows that the latter versions are current in the repos. Did something travel backward in time?

Outdated mirror. This was something that got solved in Saturday.

Why would the website show otherwise?

http://www.archlinux.org/packages/?q=libxcb

It shows 1.7-3 for lib32-libxcb and 1.7-2 for libxcb here for me. Doubt my browser checks for /etc/pacman.d/mirrorlist (hopefully).

Because libxcb 1.8 was dropped. See [1]

[1] http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2012-January/022433.h...

Thanks, missed that. Sorry for the noise.