[arch-general] why QT-4.5.0-4 is compiled with exceptions?
Hi I see that QT is now compiled with exceptions enabled. There is a reason for it? Searching in the forum, looking for why this change, I encountered only one old topic(2005) [#1]. (A discussion about it between phrakture and vicious) the C++ exception handling has been improved since those days? Thanks, [#1] http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=8998 -- Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi ( djgera ) http://www.djgera.com.ar KeyID: 0x1B8C330D Key fingerprint = 0CAA D5D4 CD85 4434 A219 76ED 39AB 221B 1B8C 330D
Am Mittwoch 25 März 2009 schrieb Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi:
Hi
I see that QT is now compiled with exceptions enabled. There is a reason for it? Searching in the forum, looking for why this change, I encountered only one old topic(2005) [#1]. (A discussion about it between phrakture and vicious) the C++ exception handling has been improved since those days?
Thanks,
[#1] http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=8998 It will be needed by amarok, thats the reason for it.
-- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tpowa@archlinux.org
On Wednesday 25 March 2009 19:59:56 Tobias Powalowski wrote:
Am Mittwoch 25 März 2009 schrieb Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi:
Hi
I see that QT is now compiled with exceptions enabled. There is a reason for it? Searching in the forum, looking for why this change, I encountered only one old topic(2005) [#1]. (A discussion about it between phrakture and vicious) the C++ exception handling has been improved since those days?
Thanks,
It will be needed by amarok, thats the reason for it.
That means that amarok 2.0 will finally enter [extra] ? -- --------------------------------- Dan Vrátil progdan@progdansoft.com ICQ 249163429 Jabber progdan@jabber.cz Tel. +420 732 326 870
Tobias Powalowski wrote:
Am Mittwoch 25 März 2009 schrieb Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi:
Hi
I see that QT is now compiled with exceptions enabled. There is a reason for it? Searching in the forum, looking for why this change, I encountered only one old topic(2005) [#1]. (A discussion about it between phrakture and vicious) the C++ exception handling has been improved since those days?
Thanks,
It will be needed by amarok, thats the reason for it.
Ooh thanks for the answer. :) Maybe some overhead in these days aren't a problem at all ;) -- Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi ( djgera ) http://www.djgera.com.ar KeyID: 0x1B8C330D Key fingerprint = 0CAA D5D4 CD85 4434 A219 76ED 39AB 221B 1B8C 330D
2009/3/25 Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi <vmlinuz386@yahoo.com.ar>:
Hi
I see that QT is now compiled with exceptions enabled. There is a reason for it? Searching in the forum, looking for why this change, I encountered only one old topic(2005) [#1]. (A discussion about it between phrakture and vicious) the C++ exception handling has been improved since those days?
Thanks,
[#1] http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=8998
-- Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi ( djgera ) http://www.djgera.com.ar KeyID: 0x1B8C330D Key fingerprint = 0CAA D5D4 CD85 4434 A219 76ED 39AB 221B 1B8C 330D
Why not compile Qt with exceptions? It's IMO quite useful for development. regards, Lukáš "stativ" Jirkovský
Lukáš Jirkovský wrote:
2009/3/25 Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi <vmlinuz386@yahoo.com.ar>:
Hi
I see that QT is now compiled with exceptions enabled. There is a reason for it? Searching in the forum, looking for why this change, I encountered only one old topic(2005) [#1]. (A discussion about it between phrakture and vicious) the C++ exception handling has been improved since those days?
Thanks,
Why not compile Qt with exceptions? It's IMO quite useful for development.
regards, Lukáš "stativ" Jirkovský
Yes, agree. But this was only a question ;) QT is commonly compiled without it, and now with it. Is a recomendation in readme from qt-copy, since KDE don't use it. There is no problem with it :) -- Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi ( djgera ) http://www.djgera.com.ar KeyID: 0x1B8C330D Key fingerprint = 0CAA D5D4 CD85 4434 A219 76ED 39AB 221B 1B8C 330D
participants (4)
-
Dan Vratil
-
Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi
-
Lukáš Jirkovský
-
Tobias Powalowski