Tobias Powalowski wrote:

Am Mittwoch 25 März 2009 schrieb Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi:

...

Hi

I see that QT is now compiled with exceptions enabled. There is a reason for it? Searching in the forum, looking for why this change, I encountered only one old topic(2005) [#1]. (A discussion about it between phrakture and vicious) the C++ exception handling has been improved since those days?

Thanks,

[#1] http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=8998

It will be needed by amarok, thats the reason for it.

Ooh thanks for the answer. :) Maybe some overhead in these days aren't a problem at all ;) -- Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi ( djgera ) http://www.djgera.com.ar KeyID: 0x1B8C330D Key fingerprint = 0CAA D5D4 CD85 4434 A219 76ED 39AB 221B 1B8C 330D

Lukáš Jirkovský wrote:

2009/3/25 Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi :

...

Hi

I see that QT is now compiled with exceptions enabled. There is a reason for it? Searching in the forum, looking for why this change, I encountered only one old topic(2005) [#1]. (A discussion about it between phrakture and vicious) the C++ exception handling has been improved since those days?

Thanks,

[#1] http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=8998

Why not compile Qt with exceptions? It's IMO quite useful for development.

regards, Lukáš "stativ" Jirkovský

Yes, agree. But this was only a question ;) QT is commonly compiled without it, and now with it. Is a recomendation in readme from qt-copy, since KDE don't use it. There is no problem with it :) -- Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi ( djgera ) http://www.djgera.com.ar KeyID: 0x1B8C330D Key fingerprint = 0CAA D5D4 CD85 4434 A219 76ED 39AB 221B 1B8C 330D