Re: [arch-general] arch-general Digest, Vol 142, Issue 24
On 08/18/2016 08:49 PM, arch-general-request@archlinux.org wrote:
Send arch-general mailing list submissions to arch-general@archlinux.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.archlinux.org/listinfo/arch-general or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to arch-general-request@archlinux.org
You can reach the person managing the list at arch-general-owner@archlinux.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of arch-general digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Opinions on PowerShell? (Hunter Connelly) 2. Re: Opinions on PowerShell? (Kyle Terrien) 3. Re: Opinions on PowerShell? (Eli Schwartz) 4. Re: Opinions on PowerShell? (Kyle Terrien) 5. Re: Opinions on PowerShell? (Hunter Connelly) 6. Re: Opinions on PowerShell? (Eli Schwartz) 7. Re: Opinions on PowerShell? (Eli Schwartz)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1 Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 19:30:27 -0400 From: Hunter Connelly
To: arch-general@archlinux.org Subject: [arch-general] Opinions on PowerShell? Message-ID: <20160818233015.GA27297@Hunters-Laptop.fios-router.home> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Recently, Microsoft released the source code for PowerShell under the MIT license. Here's the link for that.
https://github.com/powershell/powershell
I was wondering what you guys thought about it. Specifically, if any of you will be using it, if you think it should be in the main repos, what this might mean for the future, etc.
Nothing personal to the OP(maybe this wasn't intentional flamebait), but I, myself, don't want to hear "news"/propaganda about MS open source trapware in an Arch Linux mailing list or anywhere else for that matter. I see it's been uploaded it to aur. great. I won't be using it or voting for it's inclusion in official repos. I'll refrain from responding to "what this might mean for the future".
I was just wondering about what people thought about having MS code in the repos. I remember Skype used to be in multilib, and that wasn't even open source. I didn't expect this much of a reaction. Sorry if this isn't the place to discuss things like that.
On August 19, 2016 11:17:34 AM EDT, "ITwrx.org"
On 08/18/2016 08:49 PM, arch-general-request@archlinux.org wrote:
Send arch-general mailing list submissions to arch-general@archlinux.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.archlinux.org/listinfo/arch-general or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to arch-general-request@archlinux.org
You can reach the person managing the list at arch-general-owner@archlinux.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of arch-general digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Opinions on PowerShell? (Hunter Connelly) 2. Re: Opinions on PowerShell? (Kyle Terrien) 3. Re: Opinions on PowerShell? (Eli Schwartz) 4. Re: Opinions on PowerShell? (Kyle Terrien) 5. Re: Opinions on PowerShell? (Hunter Connelly) 6. Re: Opinions on PowerShell? (Eli Schwartz) 7. Re: Opinions on PowerShell? (Eli Schwartz)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1 Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 19:30:27 -0400 From: Hunter Connelly
To: arch-general@archlinux.org Subject: [arch-general] Opinions on PowerShell? Message-ID: <20160818233015.GA27297@Hunters-Laptop.fios-router.home> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Recently, Microsoft released the source code for PowerShell under the
MIT license.
Here's the link for that.
https://github.com/powershell/powershell
I was wondering what you guys thought about it. Specifically, if any of you will be using it, if you think it should be in the main repos, what this might mean for the future, etc.
Nothing personal to the OP(maybe this wasn't intentional flamebait), but I, myself, don't want to hear "news"/propaganda about MS open source trapware in an Arch Linux mailing list or anywhere else for that matter. I see it's been uploaded it to aur. great. I won't be using it or voting for it's inclusion in official repos. I'll refrain from responding to "what this might mean for the future".
Am 19.08.2016 um 17:17 schrieb ITwrx.org:
I, myself, don't want to hear "news"/propaganda about MS open source trapware in an Arch Linux mailing list or anywhere else for that matter.
Some might be interested in it. That's what a ML is for.
I see it's been uploaded it to aur. great. I won't be using it or voting for it's inclusion in official repos.
Well, gratz on that. Other people might find it interesting, though.
I'll refrain from responding to "what this might mean for the future".
If you want to ignore the topic altogether (which is fine, since it's your personal decision), why bother replying to the ML on this topic at all? That's just creating noise for everyone. B2T: I've been interested in Powershell since its inception, and I might even install it from AUR just for curiosity. I agree that it should not be part of the main repos, since I don't see a need for it. Nothing in AL "depends" on Powershell, so the AUR is the right place for it. But why shouldn't we discuss or even work with Powershell? It's just a new language we can use if we want to - and *don't* use, if we don't wish to. I don't understand why there's such great rejection against Powershell. Is it because it comes from MS? Is everything MS does evil? I think not. A rhetorical question to provoke thought: Would we reject a language written by e. g. the FreeBSD community? Best regards, Alex -- Ich verschlüssele meine Emails mit GPG. Erfahren Sie mehr hier: https://emailselfdefense.fsf.org/de/
On Fri, 19 Aug 2016 10:17:34 -0500
"ITwrx.org"
Nothing personal to the OP(maybe this wasn't intentional flamebait), but I, myself, don't want to hear "news"/propaganda about MS open source trapware in an Arch Linux mailing list or anywhere else for that matter.
And I don't want to hear about people that don't want to hear about it. Goes both ways.
participants (4)
-
A Blesius
-
Doug Newgard
-
Hunter Connelly
-
ITwrx.org