[arch-general] [HEADSUP] /lib/security/* moving to /usr/lib/security/
Hi guys, After gnome-3.4 move out of testing I intend to rebuild all packages with files in /lib/security to move them to /usr/lib/security. I'm using this locally and everything seems fine, so I don't expect any issues. That said, third-party packages should make note of this change as pam will no longer read modules that reside in /lib/security, so such packages must also be updated. Once this is done we only have /lib/modules left to deal with. Cheers, Tom
On Sat, 14 Apr 2012, Tom Gundersen wrote:
with files in /lib/security to move them to /usr/lib/security.
Hi Tom, I'm curious, does this move have anything to do with systemd? -- Adrian C. (anrxc) | anrxc..sysphere.org | PGP ID: D20A0618 PGP FP: 02A5 628A D8EE 2A93 996E 929F D5CB 31B7 D20A 0618
On 05/05/12 23:19, Adrian C. wrote:
On Sat, 14 Apr 2012, Tom Gundersen wrote:
with files in /lib/security to move them to /usr/lib/security.
Hi Tom, I'm curious, does this move have anything to do with systemd?
This is a part of the /usr move, as discussed previously here: http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2012-March/022625.htm... Regards, Bjørn Øivind
On Sat, 5 May 2012, Bjørn Øivind Bjørnsen wrote:
This is a part of the /usr move
Thanks, I was oblivious this was happening. -- Adrian C. (anrxc) | anrxc..sysphere.org | PGP ID: D20A0618 PGP FP: 02A5 628A D8EE 2A93 996E 929F D5CB 31B7 D20A 0618
Hi Adrian, On May 5, 2012 11:19 PM, "Adrian C." <anrxc@sysphere.org> wrote:
On Sat, 14 Apr 2012, Tom Gundersen wrote:
with files in /lib/security to move them to /usr/lib/security. Hi Tom, I'm curious, does this move have anything to do with systemd?
Depends why you ask, but I guess the answer is "no". To be more precise: it has to do with systemd in the sense that we moved /lib/systemd to /usr/lib/systemd. As Bjørn mentioned, what is happening is that we are working on moving /lib, /bin, and /sbin to /usr. -t
participants (3)
-
Adrian C.
-
Bjørn Øivind Bjørnsen
-
Tom Gundersen