I don't think this is a good reason to remove Qupzilla from arch repositories. On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 9:58 AM, Jesus Balbastro <jesusbalbastro@gmail.com> wrote:

Excuse me. I have no say or authority on this, but that sounds like an opinion. Maybe elaborate? I don't use this browser myself but if it has deviated so much from what you like im certain it has a good fork somewhere.

On Thursday, October 9, 2014, Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mardorf@rocketmail.com> wrote:

...

https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/qupzilla/

IMO Qupzilla should be removed from the official Arch repositories. Qupzilla was the browser I used. The latest update comes with the information that the old data doesn't fit to Qupzilla's new design, so users lose the complete history. Such a fundamental attitude from upstream IMO is absolutely intolerably.

On Fri, 2014-10-10 at 07:26 +0200, Jens Adam wrote:

it's already fixed in 1.8.2, see https://github.com/QupZilla/qupzilla/commit/ef6842b9d7ed5ec29a3f44ada3b60925... (that diff -> first facepalm of the day)

Ok