Re: [arch-general] The future of sysvinit in Arch: Call for Help
-remove initscripts from the repos -no more developement in git and on arch-project ML I don't see the benefit of doing that quickly, but if that's what you guys want, it is fine with me. I would be in favor of initscripts dying a natural death.
some people are stuck with initscripts for a while, letting it die naturally would be great for such usecases. i am running an arch server in a virtual private server where can not change the kernel and depend on my provider. i am quite sure, there are others around too.
"G. Schlisio" <g.schlisio@gmx.de> wrote:
-remove initscripts from the repos -no more developement in git and on arch-project ML I don't see the benefit of doing that quickly, but if that's what you guys want, it is fine with me. I would be in favor of initscripts dying a natural death.
some people are stuck with initscripts for a while, letting it die naturally would be great for such usecases. i am running an arch server in a virtual private server where can not change the kernel and depend on my provider. i am quite sure, there are others around too.
If you are running on openvz you could always just switch to another init. Runit is what I am using on mine, it is really easy to write your own services for it.
participants (2)
-
Daniel Wallace
-
G. Schlisio