Re: [arch-general] extra/progsreiserfs duplicate of core/reiserfsprogs?
Grigorios Bouzakis wrote:
Grigorios Bouzakis wrote:
See my comments on https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/9029 Tpowa must know something we dont and must be using it.
Most likely cause of the reasons mentioned here: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=143485 Testdisk uses libreiserfs. Maybe there should be a big fat warning for standalone usage though.
Gentoo also does this: progsreiserfs_warning() { ewarn "progsreiserfs has been proven dangerous in the past, generating bad" ewarn "partitions and destroying data on resize/cpfs operations." ewarn "Because of this, we do NOT provide their binaries, but only their" ewarn "libraries instead, as these are needed for other applications." } .... # Make sure users only use the official namesys binaries rm -r "${D}"/usr/{sbin,share/man} || die "cant punt the cruft" -- Greg
participants (1)
-
Grigorios Bouzakis