Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Preparing for libjpeg update
Allan McRae wrote:
Hi all,
This weekend should see the release of the first update for libjpeg in several years. Everything remains API compatible so this should be just a simple rebuild... of 130 packages from [extra]. That is too many packages for any sane person and double the number of the readline rebuilds so I will need some help. I will deal with the packages that are needed as dependencies for many other packages first. The full list is given below and I will create a TODO list closer to the time so that we can keep track of what has been done.
Given this is going to be a rather large rebuild, I will hold off until the readline rebuilds are moved from [testing]. I guess these can probably move before the weekend anyway.
Allan
Rebuild list:
<snip>
ruby <snip>
129 :) Ruby don't depends on libjpeg bah, 130 because there are two versions of wxgtk :P And 83 in community: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/15222 (sorted by maintainer and pkgname) Good Luck! -- Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi ( djgera ) http://www.djgera.com.ar KeyID: 0x1B8C330D Key fingerprint = 0CAA D5D4 CD85 4434 A219 76ED 39AB 221B 1B8C 330D
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 7:27 AM, Gerardo Exequiel
Pozzi
Allan McRae wrote:
Hi all,
This weekend should see the release of the first update for libjpeg in several years. Everything remains API compatible so this should be just a simple rebuild... of 130 packages from [extra]. That is too many packages for any sane person and double the number of the readline rebuilds so I will need some help. I will deal with the packages that are needed as dependencies for many other packages first. The full list is given below and I will create a TODO list closer to the time so that we can keep track of what has been done.
Given this is going to be a rather large rebuild, I will hold off until the readline rebuilds are moved from [testing]. I guess these can probably move before the weekend anyway.
Allan
Rebuild list:
<snip>
ruby <snip>
129 :) Ruby don't depends on libjpeg bah, 130 because there are two versions of wxgtk :P
And 83 in community: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/15222 (sorted by maintainer and pkgname)
Good Luck!
Sounds like quite a party! -- Greg
Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote:
Allan McRae wrote:
Hi all,
This weekend should see the release of the first update for libjpeg in several years. Everything remains API compatible so this should be just a simple rebuild... of 130 packages from [extra]. That is too many packages for any sane person and double the number of the readline rebuilds so I will need some help. I will deal with the packages that are needed as dependencies for many other packages first. The full list is given below and I will create a TODO list closer to the time so that we can keep track of what has been done.
Given this is going to be a rather large rebuild, I will hold off until the readline rebuilds are moved from [testing]. I guess these can probably move before the weekend anyway.
Allan
Rebuild list:
<snip>
ruby
<snip>
129 :) Ruby don't depends on libjpeg
No, it is some ruby-<foo> package from community. My script strips version numbers off but gets confused by packages in [community] that do not have the arch in the package file name...
bah, 130 because there are two versions of wxgtk :P
And the 2.6 version is old and does not have the arch in the package file name either... Good spotting. I really should fix that! Allan
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 7:44 AM, Allan McRae
And the 2.6 version is old and does not have the arch in the package file name either... Good spotting. I really should fix that!
Allan
There was some request to remove that some time ago in the flyspray as the only 2 packages depending on it were bittorrent which is now command line only and comical in [community]. -- Greg
participants (3)
-
Allan McRae
-
Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi
-
Grigorios Bouzakis