[arch-general] A bug reported, no response in two weeks
There's a nasty typo in libgringotts PKGBUILD http://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit/community.git/tree/trunk/PKGBUILD?h=p... : 'pckage()' should be changed to 'package()', otherwise the package creates no files: https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=137648 http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/i686/libgringotts/files/ I've reported the bug on 14 March 2012 https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/28920 and I've got no response so far. I'm not sure what's going on, am I missing something? I can see that the change introducing this bug has been made by someone else than the current maintainer and the person the bug is assigned to http://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit/community.git/commit/trunk?h=packages/libgringotts&id=0471d31be1a4f0cfc3dd02b291276167c00d60dd
Am Sat, 31 Mar 2012 01:23:07 +0200 schrieb Karol Blazewicz <karol.blazewicz@gmail.com>:
There's a nasty typo in libgringotts PKGBUILD http://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit/community.git/tree/trunk/PKGBUILD?h=p... : 'pckage()' should be changed to 'package()', otherwise the package creates no files: https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=137648 http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/i686/libgringotts/files/
I've reported the bug on 14 March 2012 https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/28920 and I've got no response so far.
I guess aur-general would be the better mailing list for this thread, since libgringotts is in [community] and maintained by a TU. ;-) Nevertheless I can confirm this bug and pacman -Ql libgringotts indeed puts out nothing. Severity should be changed to high, btw. Heiko
On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 03:03:06 +0200, Heiko Baums <lists@baums-on-web.de> wrote:
I guess aur-general would be the better mailing list for this thread, since libgringotts is in [community] and maintained by a TU. ;-)
Ah yes, my bad.
Nevertheless I can confirm this bug and pacman -Ql libgringotts indeed puts out nothing. Severity should be changed to high, btw.
That's again my bad, I guess. I thought "Hey, osmo (which depends on libgringotts) still works and the bug wrangler can set the severity to 'high' if he thinks it's that important." Maybe I should have sticked to https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Reporting_Bug_Guidelines#Severity and provide a more detailed explanation why is this typo a particularly nasty one.
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 7:23 PM, Karol Blazewicz <karol.blazewicz@gmail.com> wrote:
There's a nasty typo in libgringotts PKGBUILD http://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit/community.git/tree/trunk/PKGBUILD?h=p... : 'pckage()' should be changed to 'package()', otherwise the package creates no files: https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=137648 http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/i686/libgringotts/files/
I've reported the bug on 14 March 2012 https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/28920 and I've got no response so far.
I'm not sure what's going on, am I missing something? I can see that the change introducing this bug has been made by someone else than the current maintainer and the person the bug is assigned to http://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit/community.git/commit/trunk?h=packages/libgringotts&id=0471d31be1a4f0cfc3dd02b291276167c00d60dd
I've added the last TU who modified the package to the list of assignees.
On 31 March 2012 01:23, Karol Blazewicz <karol.blazewicz@gmail.com> wrote:
There's a nasty typo in libgringotts PKGBUILD http://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit/community.git/tree/trunk/PKGBUILD?h=p... : 'pckage()' should be changed to 'package()', otherwise the package creates no files: https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=137648 http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/i686/libgringotts/files/
I've reported the bug on 14 March 2012 https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/28920 and I've got no response so far.
I'm not sure what's going on, am I missing something? I can see that the change introducing this bug has been made by someone else than the current maintainer and the person the bug is assigned to http://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit/community.git/commit/trunk?h=packages/libgringotts&id=0471d31be1a4f0cfc3dd02b291276167c00d60dd
I'm onto fixing it. I think the reason why it wasn't fixed is that dragonlord isn't very active (actually I haven't seen him active for quite maybe a few months). Lukas
On 31 March 2012 14:17, Lukáš Jirkovský <l.jirkovsky@gmail.com> wrote:
I'm onto fixing it. I think the reason why it wasn't fixed is that dragonlord isn't very active (actually I haven't seen him active for quite maybe a few months).
He is - sporadically. He should reply if you ask him on IRC. -- GPG/PGP ID: C0711BF1
On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 10:17:32 +0200, Lukáš Jirkovský <l.jirkovsky@gmail.com> wrote:
I'm onto fixing it. I think the reason why it wasn't fixed is that dragonlord isn't very active (actually I haven't seen him active for quite maybe a few months).
I did check https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Trusted_Users#Active_Trusted_Users and it says he is active.
Oh, I forgot to mention that I've fixed both the mentioned bug and a related osmo bug a few hours ago. Lukas
On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 14:24:43 +0200, Lukáš Jirkovský <l.jirkovsky@gmail.com> wrote:
Oh, I forgot to mention that I've fixed both the mentioned bug and a related osmo bug a few hours ago.
Thanks :-)
Am Sat, 31 Mar 2012 14:24:43 +0200 schrieb Lukáš Jirkovský <l.jirkovsky@gmail.com>:
Oh, I forgot to mention that I've fixed both the mentioned bug and a related osmo bug a few hours ago.
Thanks form me, too. Heiko
participants (6)
-
Eric Bélanger
-
Heiko Baums
-
Karol Blazewicz
-
Karol Błażewicz
-
Lukáš Jirkovský
-
Rashif Ray Rahman