[arch-general] final release candidate images for testing
new images are done. version: 2010.05.13 these are the images I want to rename to an official 2010.05 release after testing. http://build.archlinux.org/isos/Changelog http://build.archlinux.org/isos/ how should they be tested? for every file, that is: archlinux-2010.05.13-core-dual.iso archlinux-2010.05.13-core-i686.iso archlinux-2010.05.13-core-x86_64.iso archlinux-2010.05.13-netinstall-dual.iso archlinux-2010.05.13-netinstall-i686.iso archlinux-2010.05.13-netinstall-x86_64.iso I want to get a report from someone that an installation went fine. what kind of install doesn't really matter. manual, automatic, autoprepare, net/core whatever. this has been tested enough before, so any kind of install with each single image. On top of that, I want: A) confirmation for virtio_pci and virtio_blk on the install ISO's initramfs http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/19401?project=6 B) at least one installation performed from a usb stick, using any of the above images. So if you test: send a reply mentioning which file you tested, and optionally if you can confirm A/B thanks for you help, Dieter
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 11:16 PM, Dieter Plaetinck <dieter@plaetinck.be> wrote:
new images are done. version: 2010.05.13
these are the images I want to rename to an official 2010.05 release after testing.
http://build.archlinux.org/isos/Changelog http://build.archlinux.org/isos/
how should they be tested?
for every file, that is:
archlinux-2010.05.13-core-dual.iso archlinux-2010.05.13-core-i686.iso archlinux-2010.05.13-core-x86_64.iso archlinux-2010.05.13-netinstall-dual.iso archlinux-2010.05.13-netinstall-i686.iso archlinux-2010.05.13-netinstall-x86_64.iso
I want to get a report from someone that an installation went fine. what kind of install doesn't really matter. manual, automatic, autoprepare, net/core whatever. this has been tested enough before, so any kind of install with each single image.
On top of that, I want: A) confirmation for virtio_pci and virtio_blk on the install ISO's initramfs http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/19401?project=6 B) at least one installation performed from a usb stick, using any of the above images.
So if you test: send a reply mentioning which file you tested, and optionally if you can confirm A/B My current system is installed from previous archlinux-2010.04.05-core-i686 image, but no idea about the release candidate image. I am using an IBM T43P.
thanks for you help, Dieter
14.05.2010 18:16, Dieter Plaetinck пишет:
new images are done. version: 2010.05.13
these are the images I want to rename to an official 2010.05 release after testing.
http://build.archlinux.org/isos/Changelog http://build.archlinux.org/isos/
how should they be tested?
for every file, that is:
archlinux-2010.05.13-core-dual.iso archlinux-2010.05.13-core-i686.iso archlinux-2010.05.13-core-x86_64.iso archlinux-2010.05.13-netinstall-dual.iso archlinux-2010.05.13-netinstall-i686.iso archlinux-2010.05.13-netinstall-x86_64.iso
I want to get a report from someone that an installation went fine. what kind of install doesn't really matter. manual, automatic, autoprepare, net/core whatever. this has been tested enough before, so any kind of install with each single image.
On top of that, I want: A) confirmation for virtio_pci and virtio_blk on the install ISO's initramfs http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/19401?project=6 B) at least one installation performed from a usb stick, using any of the above images.
So if you test: send a reply mentioning which file you tested, and optionally if you can confirm A/B
thanks for you help, Dieter
Hello, I'm testing archlinux-2010.05.13-core-i686.iso, AIF does not see HDD on computer. Computer Configuration: 00:00.0 Host bridge: ATI Technologies Inc Radeon Xpress 200 Host Bridge (rev 01) 00:01.0 PCI bridge: ATI Technologies Inc RS480 PCI Bridge 00:19.0 PCI bridge: ALi Corporation M5249 HTT to PCI Bridge 00:1b.0 Ethernet controller: ALi Corporation ULi 1689,1573 integrated ethernet. (rev 50) 00:1c.0 USB Controller: ALi Corporation USB 1.1 Controller (rev 03) 00:1c.1 USB Controller: ALi Corporation USB 1.1 Controller (rev 03) 00:1c.2 USB Controller: ALi Corporation USB 1.1 Controller (rev 03) 00:1c.3 USB Controller: ALi Corporation USB 2.0 Controller (rev 01) 00:1d.0 Audio device: ALi Corporation High Definition Audio/AC'97 Host Controller 00:1e.0 ISA bridge: ALi Corporation PCI to LPC Controller (rev 31) 00:1e.1 Bridge: ALi Corporation M7101 Power Management Controller [PMU] 00:1f.0 IDE interface: ALi Corporation M5229 IDE (rev c7) 00:1f.1 SATA controller: ALi Corporation ULi 5287 SATA (rev 02) 01:05.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc RC410 [Radeon Xpress 200] What can you recommend? -- Best regards, Dmitry Korzhevin Tel: +38 (039) 295-0000 Office Phone: +38 (044) 383-14-12 E-mail: dkorzhevin@lsupport.net Jabber ID: dkorzhevin@lsupport.net Skype: dkorzhevin URL: http://lsupport.net Linux Support LLC
On Sat, 15 May 2010 10:04:40 +0300 Dmitry Korzhevin <dkorzhevin@lsupport.net> wrote:
14.05.2010 18:16, Dieter Plaetinck пишет:
new images are done. version: 2010.05.13
these are the images I want to rename to an official 2010.05 release after testing.
http://build.archlinux.org/isos/Changelog http://build.archlinux.org/isos/
how should they be tested?
for every file, that is:
archlinux-2010.05.13-core-dual.iso archlinux-2010.05.13-core-i686.iso archlinux-2010.05.13-core-x86_64.iso archlinux-2010.05.13-netinstall-dual.iso archlinux-2010.05.13-netinstall-i686.iso archlinux-2010.05.13-netinstall-x86_64.iso
I want to get a report from someone that an installation went fine. what kind of install doesn't really matter. manual, automatic, autoprepare, net/core whatever. this has been tested enough before, so any kind of install with each single image.
On top of that, I want: A) confirmation for virtio_pci and virtio_blk on the install ISO's initramfs http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/19401?project=6 B) at least one installation performed from a usb stick, using any of the above images.
So if you test: send a reply mentioning which file you tested, and optionally if you can confirm A/B
thanks for you help, Dieter
Hello,
I'm testing archlinux-2010.05.13-core-i686.iso, AIF does not see HDD on computer.
Computer Configuration:
00:00.0 Host bridge: ATI Technologies Inc Radeon Xpress 200 Host Bridge (rev 01) 00:01.0 PCI bridge: ATI Technologies Inc RS480 PCI Bridge 00:19.0 PCI bridge: ALi Corporation M5249 HTT to PCI Bridge 00:1b.0 Ethernet controller: ALi Corporation ULi 1689,1573 integrated ethernet. (rev 50) 00:1c.0 USB Controller: ALi Corporation USB 1.1 Controller (rev 03) 00:1c.1 USB Controller: ALi Corporation USB 1.1 Controller (rev 03) 00:1c.2 USB Controller: ALi Corporation USB 1.1 Controller (rev 03) 00:1c.3 USB Controller: ALi Corporation USB 2.0 Controller (rev 01) 00:1d.0 Audio device: ALi Corporation High Definition Audio/AC'97 Host Controller 00:1e.0 ISA bridge: ALi Corporation PCI to LPC Controller (rev 31) 00:1e.1 Bridge: ALi Corporation M7101 Power Management Controller [PMU] 00:1f.0 IDE interface: ALi Corporation M5229 IDE (rev c7) 00:1f.1 SATA controller: ALi Corporation ULi 5287 SATA (rev 02) 01:05.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc RC410 [Radeon Xpress 200]
What can you recommend?
thanks for testing, please make a bugreport on the bugtracker, in which you specify: - full dmesg output (on a pastebin) - fdisk -l (as root) thanks, dieter
archlinux-2010.05.13-netinstall-i686.iso , installed on asus 1005 HA, from usb stick, everything went fine. Just didn't detect wireless with kernel 2.6.32, but that's solved after updating. 2010/5/15 Dieter Plaetinck <dieter@plaetinck.be>
On Sat, 15 May 2010 10:04:40 +0300 Dmitry Korzhevin <dkorzhevin@lsupport.net> wrote:
14.05.2010 18:16, Dieter Plaetinck пишет:
new images are done. version: 2010.05.13
these are the images I want to rename to an official 2010.05 release after testing.
http://build.archlinux.org/isos/Changelog http://build.archlinux.org/isos/
how should they be tested?
for every file, that is:
archlinux-2010.05.13-core-dual.iso archlinux-2010.05.13-core-i686.iso archlinux-2010.05.13-core-x86_64.iso archlinux-2010.05.13-netinstall-dual.iso archlinux-2010.05.13-netinstall-i686.iso archlinux-2010.05.13-netinstall-x86_64.iso
I want to get a report from someone that an installation went fine. what kind of install doesn't really matter. manual, automatic, autoprepare, net/core whatever. this has been tested enough before, so any kind of install with each single image.
On top of that, I want: A) confirmation for virtio_pci and virtio_blk on the install ISO's initramfs http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/19401?project=6 B) at least one installation performed from a usb stick, using any of the above images.
So if you test: send a reply mentioning which file you tested, and optionally if you can confirm A/B
thanks for you help, Dieter
Hello,
I'm testing archlinux-2010.05.13-core-i686.iso, AIF does not see HDD on computer.
Computer Configuration:
00:00.0 Host bridge: ATI Technologies Inc Radeon Xpress 200 Host Bridge (rev 01) 00:01.0 PCI bridge: ATI Technologies Inc RS480 PCI Bridge 00:19.0 PCI bridge: ALi Corporation M5249 HTT to PCI Bridge 00:1b.0 Ethernet controller: ALi Corporation ULi 1689,1573 integrated ethernet. (rev 50) 00:1c.0 USB Controller: ALi Corporation USB 1.1 Controller (rev 03) 00:1c.1 USB Controller: ALi Corporation USB 1.1 Controller (rev 03) 00:1c.2 USB Controller: ALi Corporation USB 1.1 Controller (rev 03) 00:1c.3 USB Controller: ALi Corporation USB 2.0 Controller (rev 01) 00:1d.0 Audio device: ALi Corporation High Definition Audio/AC'97 Host Controller 00:1e.0 ISA bridge: ALi Corporation PCI to LPC Controller (rev 31) 00:1e.1 Bridge: ALi Corporation M7101 Power Management Controller [PMU] 00:1f.0 IDE interface: ALi Corporation M5229 IDE (rev c7) 00:1f.1 SATA controller: ALi Corporation ULi 5287 SATA (rev 02) 01:05.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc RC410 [Radeon Xpress 200]
What can you recommend?
thanks for testing, please make a bugreport on the bugtracker, in which you specify: - full dmesg output (on a pastebin) - fdisk -l (as root)
thanks, dieter
2010/5/15 Dries De Smet <driesdesmet@gmail.com>:
archlinux-2010.05.13-netinstall-i686.iso , installed on asus 1005 HA, from usb stick, everything went fine. Just didn't detect wireless with kernel 2.6.32, but that's solved after updating.
Are you using 2.6.32 on the isos? I suppose you don't want to change this, but I think there are more devices than just the asus 1005HA using this wireless chip, and it really doesn't work with 2.6.32. This could be a pain for some people.
On Sun, 16 May 2010 10:22:30 +0200 Michael Towers <larch42@googlemail.com> wrote:
2010/5/15 Dries De Smet <driesdesmet@gmail.com>:
archlinux-2010.05.13-netinstall-i686.iso , installed on asus 1005 HA, from usb stick, everything went fine. Just didn't detect wireless with kernel 2.6.32, but that's solved after updating.
Are you using 2.6.32 on the isos? I suppose you don't want to change this, but I think there are more devices than just the asus 1005HA using this wireless chip, and it really doesn't work with 2.6.32. This could be a pain for some people.
all images should be built with 2.6.33.3-2, it's also this kernel that should be available as a package on core images. i have to go now, i can check later what the package is in core images, but maybe someone else can do it in the meantime. Dieter
On Sun, 16 May 2010 10:41:39 +0200 Dieter Plaetinck <dieter@plaetinck.be> wrote:
On Sun, 16 May 2010 10:22:30 +0200 Michael Towers <larch42@googlemail.com> wrote:
2010/5/15 Dries De Smet <driesdesmet@gmail.com>:
archlinux-2010.05.13-netinstall-i686.iso , installed on asus 1005 HA, from usb stick, everything went fine. Just didn't detect wireless with kernel 2.6.32, but that's solved after updating.
Are you using 2.6.32 on the isos? I suppose you don't want to change this, but I think there are more devices than just the asus 1005HA using this wireless chip, and it really doesn't work with 2.6.32. This could be a pain for some people.
all images should be built with 2.6.33.3-2, it's also this kernel that should be available as a package on core images. i have to go now, i can check later what the package is in core images, but maybe someone else can do it in the meantime.
Dieter
okay, where do you guys see this 2.6.32 ? netinstall and core install use 2.6.33, and the version in /src/core/pkg on the core image is also 2.6.33 (tested the i686 images). so please explain.. or are you doing a netinstall with a really outdated mirror? Dieter
Am 16.05.2010 12:23, schrieb Dieter Plaetinck:
2010/5/15 Dries De Smet <driesdesmet@gmail.com>:
archlinux-2010.05.13-netinstall-i686.iso , installed on asus 1005 HA, from usb stick, everything went fine. Just didn't detect wireless with kernel 2.6.32, but that's solved after updating.
okay, where do you guys see this 2.6.32 ? netinstall and core install use 2.6.33, and the version in /src/core/pkg on the core image is also 2.6.33 (tested the i686 images).
This looks like the wireless issue Chris and Keith had.
I'm sorry if I caused anyone work over this, but I must have been sleepy, I saw the link to the images, downloaded the first netinstall I saw & tested it, not realising it was the new image, but the one from april :-( . Feel a bit ashamed that I didn't double check this, but I only realised it now, I was out all day & just saw the firefox download list... 2010/5/16 Thomas Bächler <thomas@archlinux.org>
Am 16.05.2010 12:23, schrieb Dieter Plaetinck:
2010/5/15 Dries De Smet <driesdesmet@gmail.com>:
archlinux-2010.05.13-netinstall-i686.iso , installed on asus 1005 HA, from usb stick, everything went fine. Just didn't detect wireless with kernel 2.6.32, but that's solved after updating.
okay, where do you guys see this 2.6.32 ? netinstall and core install use 2.6.33, and the version in /src/core/pkg on the core image is also 2.6.33 (tested the i686 images).
This looks like the wireless issue Chris and Keith had.
On Mon, 17 May 2010 00:25:24 +0200 Dries De Smet <driesdesmet@gmail.com> wrote:
I'm sorry if I caused anyone work over this, but I must have been sleepy, I saw the link to the images, downloaded the first netinstall I saw & tested it, not realising it was the new image, but the one from april :-( .
Feel a bit ashamed that I didn't double check this, but I only realised it now, I was out all day & just saw the firefox download list...
that's ok... I knew you must have made a mistake so i didn't put too much time in it ;) Dieter
participants (6)
-
Dieter Plaetinck
-
Dmitry Korzhevin
-
Dries De Smet
-
Michael Towers
-
Thomas Bächler
-
甘露(Gan Lu)