Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Risky business: udev upgrade
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 1:45 AM, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin@gmail.com> wrote:
start_udev is still there because people were jackasses and didn't update initscripts when they updated udev.... or something.. I can't remember the issue, but it was people being foolish and expecting their systems to boot fine.
Is everyone ok with removing it?
Just remember to update /etc/udev/readme-udev-arch.txt: it still references start_udev as the way to reload rules, and it's also mentioned in another couple of places in that file. Corrado
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 4:47 AM, bardo <ilbardo@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 1:45 AM, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin@gmail.com> wrote:
start_udev is still there because people were jackasses and didn't update initscripts when they updated udev.... or something.. I can't remember the issue, but it was people being foolish and expecting their systems to boot fine.
Is everyone ok with removing it?
Just remember to update /etc/udev/readme-udev-arch.txt: it still references start_udev as the way to reload rules, and it's also mentioned in another couple of places in that file.
Actually, I think we should remove this file. Reloading rules and all that is covered by the man pages and any arch specific documentation should be added to a wiki page so anyone can edit it. Any issues with removing this? We don't ship custom readme's with any other packages that I know of.
participants (2)
-
Aaron Griffin
-
bardo