[arch-general] pkgbuild depends() can you have both >= <=?
Guys, Is it possible to have both a 'greater than' and 'less than' dependency on any single package listed as a depends in a PKGBUILD? I want to specify gegl
=0.1.8 and <=0.2 for gimp26. Possible?
Man page says: <quote> Entries can also include a version requirement of the form name<>version, where <> is one of five comparisons: >= (greater than or equal to), <= (less than or equal to), = (equal to), > (greater than), or < (less than). </quote> Where the operative phrase is: 'is one of five...' ^^^ Can you list a depends twice? (i.e.: gegl>=0.1.8 gegl<=0.2) -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 08:16:28PM -0500, David C. Rankin wrote:
Guys,
Is it possible to have both a 'greater than' and 'less than' dependency on any single package listed as a depends in a PKGBUILD? I want to specify gegl
=0.1.8 and <=0.2 for gimp26. Possible?
Man page says:
<quote> Entries can also include a version requirement of the form name<>version, where <> is one of five comparisons: >= (greater than or equal to), <= (less than or equal to), = (equal to), > (greater than), or < (less than). </quote>
Where the operative phrase is: 'is one of five...' ^^^
Can you list a depends twice? (i.e.: gegl>=0.1.8 gegl<=0.2)
-- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.
see the pkgbuild for nvidia https://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/tree/trunk/PKGBUILD?h=p...
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 08:16:28PM -0500, David C. Rankin wrote:
Guys,
Is it possible to have both a 'greater than' and 'less than' dependency on any single package listed as a depends in a PKGBUILD? I want to specify gegl
=0.1.8 and <=0.2 for gimp26. Possible?
Man page says:
<quote> Entries can also include a version requirement of the form name<>version, where <> is one of five comparisons: >= (greater than or equal to), <= (less than or equal to), = (equal to), > (greater than), or < (less than). </quote>
Where the operative phrase is: 'is one of five...' ^^^
Can you list a depends twice? (i.e.: gegl>=0.1.8 gegl<=0.2)
Yes, and they have to be listed just like you did above, i.e. as two separate depends. /M -- Magnus Therning OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4 email: magnus@therning.org jabber: magnus@therning.org twitter: magthe http://therning.org/magnus I invented the term Object-Oriented, and I can tell you I did not have C++ in mind. -- Alan Kay
participants (3)
-
Daniel Wallace
-
David C. Rankin
-
Magnus Therning