Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Signoff report for [testing]
On 01/12/2012 03:07 AM, Arch Website Notification wrote:
* 4 known bad packages
What does this mean? What is a 'bad' package? Why doesn't the sign-off report say which packages are 'bad'? As a user of [testing] this has been bugging me, because I don't want to install 'bad' packages.
On 01/12/2012 05:19 PM, José Ramón García wrote:
On 01/12/2012 03:07 AM, Arch Website Notification wrote:
* 4 known bad packages
What does this mean? What is a 'bad' package? Why doesn't the sign-off report say which packages are 'bad'? As a user of [testing] this has been bugging me, because I don't want to install 'bad' packages.
open a feature request. those packages are not bad in the sense that you will end up with a non booting system or data loses. they have minor issues, like a missing module from kernel -- Ionuț
participants (2)
-
Ionut Biru
-
José Ramón García