Re: [arch-general] AUR deletion request
Thomas, if you simply surf to http://is.gd/Tn8wBO,and omit the last four packages (because they do not begin with "archtrack"), you will have your list with links. Evangelos, the reason for the deletion is that I'm refactoring my approach and these packages are no longer needed. They really just psuedo-packages anyway. Btw, why is it that package maintainers can't just delete their own packages?
2011/5/14 |^ `/ () () | ( (-) |
Btw, why is it that package maintainers can't just delete their own packages?
Because then nothing could stop you from adopting all orphans and mass deleting them. Corrado
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 10:54 AM, |^ `/ () () | ( (-) |
Thomas, if you simply surf to http://is.gd/Tn8wBO,and omit the last four packages (because they do not begin with "archtrack"), you will have your list with links.
Evangelos, the reason for the deletion is that I'm refactoring my approach and these packages are no longer needed. They really just psuedo-packages anyway.
Btw, why is it that package maintainers can't just delete their own packages?
deleted
2011/5/14 |^ `/ () () | ( (-) |
Thomas, if you simply surf to http://is.gd/Tn8wBO,and omit the last four packages (because they do not begin with "archtrack"), you will have your list with links.
I'm not a TU, but the way I see, it is interesting (and important) for everyone that the person who requests the deletion or to orphan packages provide the links for them. If you know the package, then you have the link - you won't miss it. However, if you relay on the TU to find it, something could go wrong (ex: accidentaly deleting wrong package), not to mention you are making their work more difficult - yours too, btw, because this requested turned to be more than just "please delete this" and "deleted". -- Rafael
participants (4)
-
Corrado Primier
-
rafael ff1
-
Thomas Dziedzic
-
|^ `/ () () | ( (-) |