Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] xfsprogs-3.0.3-1
Am Samstag 12 September 2009 schrieb Dan McGee:
On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 7:45 AM, Tobias Powalowski <t.powa@gmx.de> wrote:
Am Montag 07 September 2009 schrieb Tobias Powalowski:
Hi bump to latest version, please signoff both arches.
greetings tpowa
bump anyone?
I think we need XFS users in order to signoff; might want to ask the general public for signoffs.
-Dan
anyone uses xfs? thanks Please signoff. greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tpowa@archlinux.org
Hi!
anyone uses xfs? thanks Please signoff.
I'm using XFS, what should I do for obtaining a valid signoff? Thanks Dario Chiacchiera con i tuoi amici in tempo reale! http://it.yahoo.com/mail_it/foot/*http://it.messenger.yahoo.com
Dario wrote:
Hi!
anyone uses xfs? thanks Please signoff.
I'm using XFS, what should I do for obtaining a valid signoff?
Use the xfsprogs package from [testing] and see if everything still works. It should be safe to upgrade only that package from the [testing] repo. If it works, send a message here saying so and what architecture you use. Allan
Hi! In data domenica 11 ottobre 2009 02:32:20, Allan McRae ha scritto:
Use the xfsprogs package from [testing] and see if everything still works. It should be safe to upgrade only that package from the [testing] repo. If it works, send a message here saying so and what architecture you use.
Ok. I've tried the "safe" progs with expected results and no problems of any sort (safe = the programs that don't do something radical as xfs_mdrestore). I'm running arch i686. For me, it's all right. Hope this helps:) ciao! Dario Chiacchiera con i tuoi amici in tempo reale! http://it.yahoo.com/mail_it/foot/*http://it.messenger.yahoo.com
Am Sonntag 11 Oktober 2009 schrieb Dario:
Hi!
In data domenica 11 ottobre 2009 02:32:20, Allan McRae ha scritto:
Use the xfsprogs package from [testing] and see if everything still works. It should be safe to upgrade only that package from the [testing] repo. If it works, send a message here saying so and what architecture you use.
Ok. I've tried the "safe" progs with expected results and no problems of any sort (safe = the programs that don't do something radical as xfs_mdrestore). I'm running arch i686. For me, it's all right. Hope this helps:)
ciao!
Dario Chiacchiera con i tuoi amici in tempo reale! http://it.yahoo.com/mail_it/foot/*http://it.messenger.yahoo.com
Waiting for x86_64 signoff now. greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tpowa@archlinux.org
Tobias Powalowski wrote:
Am Sonntag 11 Oktober 2009 schrieb Dario:
Hi!
In data domenica 11 ottobre 2009 02:32:20, Allan McRae ha scritto:
Use the xfsprogs package from [testing] and see if everything still works. It should be safe to upgrade only that package from the [testing] repo. If it works, send a message here saying so and what architecture you use.
Ok. I've tried the "safe" progs with expected results and no problems of any sort (safe = the programs that don't do something radical as xfs_mdrestore). I'm running arch i686. For me, it's all right. Hope this helps:)
ciao!
Dario Chiacchiera con i tuoi amici in tempo reale! http://it.yahoo.com/mail_it/foot/*http://it.messenger.yahoo.com
Waiting for x86_64 signoff now.
I did not realize how long this has been in [testing]. Given no-one found an issue in over a month, I will give a signoff for both... Allan
You may want to post that you're looking for a signoff in the [testing] repo section of the forums. They seem to have much higher user traffic than the mailing lists as far as i can see. 2009/10/11 Tobias Powalowski <t.powa@gmx.de>
Am Sonntag 11 Oktober 2009 schrieb Dario:
Hi!
In data domenica 11 ottobre 2009 02:32:20, Allan McRae ha scritto:
Use the xfsprogs package from [testing] and see if everything still works. It should be safe to upgrade only that package from the [testing] repo. If it works, send a message here saying so and what architecture you use.
Ok. I've tried the "safe" progs with expected results and no problems of any sort (safe = the programs that don't do something radical as xfs_mdrestore). I'm running arch i686. For me, it's all right. Hope this helps:)
ciao!
Dario Chiacchiera con i tuoi amici in tempo reale! http://it.yahoo.com/mail_it/foot/*http://it.messenger.yahoo.com
Waiting for x86_64 signoff now. greetings tpowa
-- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tpowa@archlinux.org
I use xfs on / and /home and my external drive, absolutely no problems so far. Signoff for i686 * Tobias Powalowski <t.powa@gmx.de> [10.10.2009 20:11]:
Am Samstag 12 September 2009 schrieb Dan McGee:
On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 7:45 AM, Tobias Powalowski <t.powa@gmx.de> wrote:
Am Montag 07 September 2009 schrieb Tobias Powalowski:
Hi bump to latest version, please signoff both arches.
greetings tpowa
bump anyone?
I think we need XFS users in order to signoff; might want to ask the general public for signoffs.
-Dan
anyone uses xfs? thanks Please signoff.
greetings tpowa
-- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tpowa@archlinux.org
participants (5)
-
Allan McRae
-
Dario
-
Jeff Horelick
-
Tobias Powalowski
-
Uli Armbruster