Re: [arch-general] Arch Nim package

older
[arch-general] hcidump is missing?

Peter Munch-Ellingsen

7 Mar 2017 7 Mar '17

4:51 p.m.

Hi, the Nim package: https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/nim/ was marked out of date on 2016-10-24 but it's still not edited to reflect the new version of 0.16.2. Would anyone be so kind to adopt this package? If not could the package be dropped to AUR? Peter

Show replies by date

Leonidas Spyropoulos

7 Mar 7 Mar

5:01 p.m.

New subject: [arch-general] Arch Nim package

On 07/03/17, Peter Munch-Ellingsen wrote:

...

Hi, the Nim package: https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/nim/ was marked out of date on 2016-10-24 but it's still not edited to reflect the new version of 0.16.2. Would anyone be so kind to adopt this package? If not could the package be dropped to AUR?

Peter

Hello, As discussed in IRC I'd be happy to adopt this once it goes to AUR. Regards, -- Leonidas Spyropoulos A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is it such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?

Eli Schwartz

6:05 p.m.

New subject: [arch-general] Arch Nim package

On 03/07/2017 12:01 PM, Leonidas Spyropoulos via arch-general wrote:

...

On 07/03/17, Peter Munch-Ellingsen wrote:

...
Hi, the Nim package: https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/nim/ was marked out of date on 2016-10-24 but it's still not edited to reflect the new version of 0.16.2. Would anyone be so kind to adopt this package? If not could the package be dropped to AUR?

Peter

Hello,

As discussed in IRC I'd be happy to adopt this once it goes to AUR.

The maintainer is not inactive though... I don't know why he hasn't updated it yet, but it isn't in need of *adoption* on account of it isn't *orphaned*. Perhaps you could try emailing Alexander Rødseth to inquire into its lateness? It is after all, his choice whether he wishes to continue maintaining it in the repos or not. -- Eli Schwartz

Doug Newgard

6:26 p.m.

New subject: [arch-general] Arch Nim package

On Tue, 7 Mar 2017 13:05:46 -0500 Eli Schwartz via arch-general wrote:

...

On 03/07/2017 12:01 PM, Leonidas Spyropoulos via arch-general wrote:

...
On 07/03/17, Peter Munch-Ellingsen wrote:

...
Hi, the Nim package: https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/nim/ was marked out of date on 2016-10-24 but it's still not edited to reflect the new version of 0.16.2. Would anyone be so kind to adopt this package? If not could the package be dropped to AUR?

Peter

Hello,

As discussed in IRC I'd be happy to adopt this once it goes to AUR.

The maintainer is not inactive though... I don't know why he hasn't updated it yet, but it isn't in need of *adoption* on account of it isn't *orphaned*.

Perhaps you could try emailing Alexander Rødseth to inquire into its lateness? It is after all, his choice whether he wishes to continue maintaining it in the repos or not.

It's not orphaned now, it was when this email was sent. Alexander Rødseth is not the maintainer, either

Peter Munch-Ellingsen

7:01 p.m.

New subject: [arch-general] Arch Nim package

On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 7:26 PM, Doug Newgard wrote:

...

On Tue, 7 Mar 2017 13:05:46 -0500 Eli Schwartz via arch-general wrote:

...
...
On 07/03/17, Peter Munch-Ellingsen wrote:

...
Hi, the Nim package: https://www.archlinux.org/

...
...
was marked out of date on 2016-10-24 but it's still not edited to reflect the new version of 0.16.2. Would anyone be so kind to adopt this

On 03/07/2017 12:01 PM, Leonidas Spyropoulos via arch-general wrote: packages/community/x86_64/nim/ package?

...
...
If not could the package be dropped to AUR?

Peter

Hello,

As discussed in IRC I'd be happy to adopt this once it goes to AUR.

The maintainer is not inactive though... I don't know why he hasn't updated it yet, but it isn't in need of *adoption* on account of it isn't *orphaned*.

Perhaps you could try emailing Alexander Rødseth to inquire into its lateness? It is after all, his choice whether he wishes to continue maintaining it in the repos or not.

It's not orphaned now, it was when this email was sent. Alexander Rødseth is not the maintainer, either

I even tried to send him an e-mail as well, to which I received no reply. -- Peter

Alexander F Rødseth

10 Mar 10 Mar

8:11 p.m.

New subject: [arch-general] Arch Nim package

Hello, Levente Polyak is the current maintainer of nim. I was the previous maintainer a couple of months back. -- Sincerely, Alexander F Rødseth

2615

Age (days ago)

2618

Last active (days ago)

List overview

Download

5 comments

5 participants

participants (5)

Alexander F Rødseth
Doug Newgard
Eli Schwartz
Leonidas Spyropoulos
Peter Munch-Ellingsen