On 17/05/08, Byron Clark wrote:

On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 05:08:37PM +0000, Michael Krauss wrote:

...

static void sig_alarm(int signo __unused) { longjmp(timeout_alarm, 1); }

gcc can handle an unused variable attribute, but a different syntax is used:

static void sig_alarm(int signo __attribute__((unused))) { longjmp(timeout_alarm, 1); }

This one works, thanks. But I wonder how it is compiled on DragonFly because they use gcc4.1? It doesn't greatly matter. I will ask when I am sending patches upstream. Kind regards, Michael Krauss