Thanks! The update to 1.4.1 does not require any special changes. Only bumping the version and updating the hash of the source archive. Regards, Danila Kiver.

Monday, July 30, 2018 6:52 PM +03:00 from Levente Polyak :

On July 30, 2018 5:14:56 PM GMT+02:00, "данила кивер via arch-general" < arch-general@archlinux.org > wrote:

...

I want one of his packages ( https://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/visualvm ) to be updated because an important bug was fixed in the upstream (I've already built this package, installed and tested locally with the newest upstream software version). What is the correct way to handle this situation?

We had a chat recently as he currently lacks the amount of time he had before, so we discussed I jump in and help with the Java things. I gonna take a look at visualvm as well, if you have important changes other then just bumping please send me your version.

Cheers, Levente

-- данила кивер

Em julho 30, 2018 12:52 Levente Polyak via arch-general escreveu:

We had a chat recently as he currently lacks the amount of time he had before, so we discussed I jump in and help with the Java things. I gonna take a look at visualvm as well, if you have important changes other then just bumping please send me your version.

Hi Levente, Can you talk with him again and encourage him to resign or clearly state for how long he will be inactive? This would come a long way to address these issues. Regards, Giancarlo Razzolini