Hello.
Tex Live 2015 was released on June 11. The Arch packages were flagged out-of-date on June 13.
I'm wondering if there is any reason for the hold-up. Other than the maintainers(s) being busy of course.
2015-08-22 21:27 GMT+02:00 Mohammad_AlSaleh ce.mohammad.alsaleh@gmail.com:
I'm wondering if there is any reason for the hold-up. Other than the maintainers(s) being busy of course.
I'm also curious about this. It seems like the maintainer hasn't been active for the past 5 months.[1] What is the normal course of action in such a case? For instance, how could I contact the maintainer?
Thanks, Sebastiaan
I'm also curious about this. It seems like the maintainer hasn't been active for the past 5 months.[1] What is the normal course of action in such a case? For instance, how could I contact the maintainer?
TeXLive is not a critical package, so what's the rush updating it? If you really want to see an updated version, open a bugreport and attach there a patched PKGBUILD. And of course, you can always build the latest version locally (just clone the svn trunk and run makepkg)...
Cheers,
On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 17:00:18 +0000 Leonid Isaev lisaev@umail.iu.edu wrote:
I'm also curious about this. It seems like the maintainer hasn't been active for the past 5 months.[1] What is the normal course of action in such a case? For instance, how could I contact the maintainer?
TeXLive is not a critical package, so what's the rush updating it? If you really want to see an updated version, open a bugreport and attach there a patched PKGBUILD. And of course, you can always build the latest version locally (just clone the svn trunk and run makepkg)...
Cheers,
Please do not file a bug report because a package is outdated. This is the #1 rule of the bugtracker.
Doug
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 12:15:32PM -0500, Doug Newgard wrote:
On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 17:00:18 +0000 Leonid Isaev lisaev@umail.iu.edu wrote:
I'm also curious about this. It seems like the maintainer hasn't been active for the past 5 months.[1] What is the normal course of action in such a case? For instance, how could I contact the maintainer?
TeXLive is not a critical package, so what's the rush updating it? If you really want to see an updated version, open a bugreport and attach there a patched PKGBUILD. And of course, you can always build the latest version locally (just clone the svn trunk and run makepkg)...
Cheers,
Please do not file a bug report because a package is outdated. This is the #1 rule of the bugtracker.
Sorry, I meant feature request. Of course, opening tickets just to say that a package X is out-of-date is silly.
But if the project is complex (like texlive-*) then bumping it may not be a simple issue. So if I happen to go through this exercise before the maintainer, how am supposed to communicate the working PKGBUILD, in an open fashion? A ML would be best of course, but arch-general isn't a place for this...
Cheers,
2015-08-24 17:59 GMT+02:00 Sebastiaan Lokhorst sebastiaanlokhorst@gmail.com:
2015-08-22 21:27 GMT+02:00 Mohammad_AlSaleh ce.mohammad.alsaleh@gmail.com:
I'm wondering if there is any reason for the hold-up. Other than the maintainers(s) being busy of course.
I'm also curious about this. It seems like the maintainer hasn't been active for the past 5 months.[1] What is the normal course of action in such a case? For instance, how could I contact the maintainer?
Thanks, Sebastiaan
I am not very active because TeXLive is updated only once a year. I usually do a couple of incremental updates because TeXLive packages also receive continuous updates between 2 yearly releases, and to catch up with bug fixes.
The packages are now available in [testing]. They were almost ready for a while but remaining issues had to be fixed and I couldn't find the time until today.
You can always contact me through e-mail at remy@archlinux.org.
Regards, Rémy.
2015-09-01 15:01 GMT+02:00 Rémy Oudompheng remyoudompheng@gmail.com:
I am not very active because TeXLive is updated only once a year. I usually do a couple of incremental updates because TeXLive packages also receive continuous updates between 2 yearly releases, and to catch up with bug fixes.
The packages are now available in [testing]. They were almost ready for a while but remaining issues had to be fixed and I couldn't find the time until today.
You can always contact me through e-mail at remy@archlinux.org.
Regards, Rémy.
Thanks so much for your effort! I wasn't sure about your status so hence my question. Even though you only hear from us when we're complaining, we all appreciate your work! ;) Sebastiaan
On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 03:16:13PM +0200, Sebastiaan Lokhorst wrote:
2015-09-01 15:01 GMT+02:00 Rémy Oudompheng remyoudompheng@gmail.com:
I am not very active because TeXLive is updated only once a year. I usually do a couple of incremental updates because TeXLive packages also receive continuous updates between 2 yearly releases, and to catch up with bug fixes.
The packages are now available in [testing]. They were almost ready for a while but remaining issues had to be fixed and I couldn't find the time until today.
You can always contact me through e-mail at remy@archlinux.org.
Regards, Rémy.
Thanks so much for your effort! I wasn't sure about your status so hence my question. Even though you only hear from us when we're complaining, we all appreciate your work! ;) Sebastiaan
+1
Thank you for taking care of those packages. I know how unmotivating such tedious tasks can be for a volunteer.
On 2015年09月03日 00時44分, Mohammad_AlSaleh wrote:
Thank you for taking care of those packages. I know how unmotivating such tedious tasks can be for a volunteer.
I noticed the update, too. Thank you.
+1
Remy, thanks too! All of you maintainers do an excellent job! On Sep 6, 2015 9:35 PM, "Grady Martin" sunnycemetery@gmail.com wrote:
On 2015年09月03日 00時44分, Mohammad_AlSaleh wrote:
Thank you for taking care of those packages. I know how unmotivating such tedious tasks can be for a volunteer.
I noticed the update, too. Thank you.
arch-general@lists.archlinux.org