[arch-general] linux-firmware upgrade altered grub
My laptop has dual boot with Arch and Debian. I normally have it set so that it defaults to booting Arch. After an upgrade yesterday which I'm pretty sure included linux-firmware I found that boot reversed the order and there were some other unwanted effects too. I reinstalled grub and grub.cfg and things went back to normal. Is this something to expect after such an upgrade? Is it documented somewhere? -- Anthony Campbell - ac@acampbell.org.uk http://www.acupuncturecourse.org.uk http://www.smashwords.com/profile.view/acampbell https://itunes.apple.com/ca/artist/anthony-campbell/id73235412
[2013-11-06 08:56:04 +0000] Anthony Campbell:
After an upgrade yesterday which I'm pretty sure included linux-firmware I found that boot reversed the order
What do you mean by "pretty sure"? How do you know linux-firmware is to blame? This package only modifies files under /usr so it is unlikely that it affected your bootloader in any way. Perhaps if you gave us facts instead of mere speculation we could actually help...
and there were some other unwanted effects too.
Feel free to be specific. -- Gaetan
On 06 Nov 2013, Gaetan Bisson wrote:
[2013-11-06 08:56:04 +0000] Anthony Campbell:
After an upgrade yesterday which I'm pretty sure included linux-firmware I found that boot reversed the order
What do you mean by "pretty sure"? How do you know linux-firmware is to blame? This package only modifies files under /usr so it is unlikely that it affected your bootloader in any way. Perhaps if you gave us facts instead of mere speculation we could actually help...
and there were some other unwanted effects too.
Feel free to be specific.
-- Gaetan
I was relying on my memory (affected by a heavy cold) of what had been upgraded the previous day, before the change in boot order occurred. I thought that linux-firmware was the most likely source but I accept that it's unlikely. Sorry for muddying the water. -- Anthony Campbell - ac@acampbell.org.uk http://www.acupuncturecourse.org.uk http://www.smashwords.com/profile.view/acampbell https://itunes.apple.com/ca/artist/anthony-campbell/id73235412
On 07-11-2013 08:56, Anthony Campbell wrote:
I was relying on my memory (affected by a heavy cold) of what had been upgraded the previous day, before the change in boot order occurred. I thought that linux-firmware was the most likely source but I accept that it's unlikely. Sorry for muddying the water.
Check what was updated in /var/log/pacman.log, no need to guess or try to remember, it's all there ;) -- Mauro Santos
On 07 Nov 2013, Mauro Santos wrote:
On 07-11-2013 08:56, Anthony Campbell wrote:
I was relying on my memory (affected by a heavy cold) of what had been upgraded the previous day, before the change in boot order occurred. I thought that linux-firmware was the most likely source but I accept that it's unlikely. Sorry for muddying the water.
Check what was updated in /var/log/pacman.log, no need to guess or try to remember, it's all there ;)
-- Mauro Santos
Thanks for the link. I see that what happened was a kernel upgrade. This led to a lot of activity by mkinitcpio as it built the image. I don't know if that could have altered the boot sector. -- Anthony Campbell - ac@acampbell.org.uk http://www.acupuncturecourse.org.uk http://www.smashwords.com/profile.view/acampbell https://itunes.apple.com/ca/artist/anthony-campbell/id73235412
[2013-11-08 17:27:59 +0000] Anthony Campbell:
I see that what happened was a kernel upgrade. This led to a lot of activity by mkinitcpio as it built the image. I don't know if that could have altered the boot sector.
No. What may alter the boot sector is a bootloader upgrade... -- Gaetan
participants (3)
-
Anthony Campbell
-
Gaetan Bisson
-
Mauro Santos