Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Vi package
Excerpts from Allan McRae's message of 2011-02-10 17:12:54 -0500:
Is the current vi package actually usable for an install by someone more familiar with it?
Yes, I have used it a few times, and prefer it over nano. -- David Campbell
David Campbell <davekong@archlinux.us>:
Excerpts from Allan McRae's message of 2011-02-10 17:12:54 -0500:
Is the current vi package actually usable for an install by someone more familiar with it? Yes, I have used it a few times, and prefer it over nano. +1
The simple things (switching input modes and saving files) works. -- Gruß, Johannes
I'd like to say that one of the problems before was not simply the stripped down vi, but the fact that arch was setting up the example vimrc as default, which is not the actual vim default, and was never intended to be used as a distro default. so the settings people got confused long term knowledgeable vim users too. what the default is I don't care, I've long aliased vi to vim now. -- Caleb Cushing http://xenoterracide.com
participants (3)
-
Caleb Cushing
-
David Campbell
-
Johannes Held