[arch-general] community/vlock vs core/kbd vlock
Hi, I used to rely on xautolock + community/vlock for locking my X session, core/kbd however removed community/vlock in favor of its own vlock which lack the functionality I need. Besides -a -a,--all Lock all console sessions and disable VC switching. not working This tty (pts/5) is not a virtual console. The entire console display cannot be locked. I also used -n and -s -n,--new Switch to a new virtual console before locking all console sessions. -s,--disable-sysrq Disable the SysRq mechanism while consoles are locked. This option only works if the -a,--all option given. that the new vlock is lacking. Not wanting to revert to slock I reworked community/vlock into my system in a foul manner I'm not going to mention here. I've also read https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/33134 http://www.spinics.net/lists/util-linux-ng/msg07153.html https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=156308 http://forums.fedoraforum.org/archive/index.php/t-203953.html :D I'm not sure what my question should be, really, but I would like to be able to use the 2.2.3 functionality (-ans) without having an ugly hacky setup. Regards, -- Fredrik
On Thu, 24 Jan 2013 23:21:23 +0100 Fredrik Eriksson <erif-archlinux-general@z42.net> wrote:
Hi,
I used to rely on xautolock + community/vlock for locking my X session, core/kbd however removed community/vlock in favor of its own vlock which lack the functionality I need. Besides -a
-a,--all
Lock all console sessions and disable VC switching.
not working
This tty (pts/5) is not a virtual console. The entire console display cannot be locked.
I also used -n and -s
-n,--new
Switch to a new virtual console before locking all console sessions.
-s,--disable-sysrq
Disable the SysRq mechanism while consoles are locked. This option only works if the -a,--all option given.
that the new vlock is lacking.
Not wanting to revert to slock I reworked community/vlock into my system in a foul manner I'm not going to mention here.
I've also read
https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/33134 http://www.spinics.net/lists/util-linux-ng/msg07153.html https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=156308 http://forums.fedoraforum.org/archive/index.php/t-203953.html :D
I'm not sure what my question should be, really, but I would like to be able to use the 2.2.3 functionality (-ans) without having an ugly hacky setup.
Regards,
Make a package for the "old" vlock or get upstream to impliment the features in the one in kbd. (vlock with some extra patches is in aur btw)
participants (2)
-
Fredrik Eriksson
-
Øyvind Heggstad