Op vrijdag 8 juni 2012 23:29:49 schreef u:

Op vrijdag 8 juni 2012 15:32:19 schreef Dan McGee:

...

On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 2:54 PM, Tobias Powalowski

<tobias.powalowski@googlemail.com> wrote:

...

Hi guys, signoffs are done, anything that stops us from moving to new kernel series?

Do we just blindly follow the signoffs page, or do we actually notice people having trouble? It seemed quite obvious to me this should not move: http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2012-June/023072.ht ml

-Dan

since i cant post to arch-dev-public i'll do it here.

there are some serious issues with 3.4+ with nfsv4, the issues should be taken care of in 3.4.2

maybe you could bring in a 'testing' kernel being 3.4.2-rc1 kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.4.2-rc1.gz patch this on top of your 3.4.1 tree and test ?

people having issues with nfsv4 could already see if it would be solved with a possible 3.4.2 patch and then when 3.4.2 becomes 'official' just do a short retest if there are no regressions from rc to official.

after a really 'small' test i don't seem to have any problems with nfsv4 with 3.4.2-rc1

--Ike

another thought, you could even drop the rc kernel in staging and notify the people with issues they can test from there --Ike