[arch-general] Radeon (xf86-video-ati) verdict
After working with the ati driver instead of the radeonhd driver, I must say I am very impressed with the KMS implementation. It works much, much better than in the past (performance is still way short of fglrx, and it is still much HOTTER than fglrx , but screen artifacts are virtually eliminated, desktop effects are good, and compiz works very well with the driver. Helluva job Arch team! -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E. Rankin Law Firm, PLLC 510 Ochiltree Street Nacogdoches, Texas 75961 Telephone: (936) 715-9333 Facsimile: (936) 715-9339 www.rankinlawfirm.com
On Thu, 2009-11-05 at 01:55 -0600, David C. Rankin wrote:
After working with the ati driver instead of the radeonhd driver, I must say I am very impressed with the KMS implementation. It works much, much better than in the past (performance is still way short of fglrx, and it is still much HOTTER than fglrx , but screen artifacts are virtually eliminated, desktop effects are good, and compiz works very well with the driver.
Helluva job Arch team!
Uhh... credit where credit is due, and the ati driver isn't written/maintained by the Arch dev team =)
On Thu, 2009-11-05 at 16:19 +0800, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
We just took the right git snapshot that works on his system ;)
On Thu, 2009-11-05 at 09:22 +0100, Jan de Groot wrote:
Ah, how could I have overlooked that. Helluva job JGC and co! =)
participants (3)
-
David C. Rankin
-
Jan de Groot
-
Ng Oon-Ee