[arch-general] Replies on arch-general to dev emails (was: Cron)
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 12:35 AM, Heiko Baums <lists@baums-on-web.de> wrote:
I again answer to arch-general due to write permissions.
You realize you don't need to say this *every single time* you answer an email from arch-dev-public? We do this (restrict who can post to that list) quite on purpose, and this is the defined method of answering these emails. Every dev subscribes to this list too so it isn't like your email is getting lost. -Dan
On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 07:52:38AM -0600, Dan McGee wrote:
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 12:35 AM, Heiko Baums <lists@baums-on-web.de> wrote:
I again answer to arch-general due to write permissions.
You realize you don't need to say this *every single time* you answer an email from arch-dev-public? We do this (restrict who can post to that list) quite on purpose, and this is the defined method of answering these emails. Every dev subscribes to this list too so it isn't like your email is getting lost.
Hi Dan, I didn't know that either. I've several times wanted to reply to arch-dev-public emails and didn't know how. It's helpful to hear this is the expected protocol, thanks. -- Jim Pryor profjim@jimpryor.net
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 9:57 AM, Jim Pryor <lists+arch-general@jimpryor.net> wrote:
On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 07:52:38AM -0600, Dan McGee wrote:
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 12:35 AM, Heiko Baums <lists@baums-on-web.de> wrote:
I again answer to arch-general due to write permissions.
You realize you don't need to say this *every single time* you answer an email from arch-dev-public? We do this (restrict who can post to that list) quite on purpose, and this is the defined method of answering these emails. Every dev subscribes to this list too so it isn't like your email is getting lost.
Hi Dan, I didn't know that either. I've several times wanted to reply to arch-dev-public emails and didn't know how. It's helpful to hear this is the expected protocol, thanks.
It used to (not sure if the message has changed) indicate this in the error response when trying to post to arch-dev-public. Something to the effect of "please send your reply to arch-general"
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 9:59 AM, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 9:57 AM, Jim Pryor <lists+arch-general@jimpryor.net> wrote:
On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 07:52:38AM -0600, Dan McGee wrote:
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 12:35 AM, Heiko Baums <lists@baums-on-web.de> wrote:
I again answer to arch-general due to write permissions.
You realize you don't need to say this *every single time* you answer an email from arch-dev-public? We do this (restrict who can post to that list) quite on purpose, and this is the defined method of answering these emails. Every dev subscribes to this list too so it isn't like your email is getting lost.
Hi Dan, I didn't know that either. I've several times wanted to reply to arch-dev-public emails and didn't know how. It's helpful to hear this is the expected protocol, thanks.
It used to (not sure if the message has changed) indicate this in the error response when trying to post to arch-dev-public. Something to the effect of "please send your reply to arch-general"
On that note, sorry for being a bit blunt as I thought it was more widely known. I guess now it is. :) -Dan
Am Mon, 4 Jan 2010 09:59:49 -0600 schrieb Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin@gmail.com>:
You realize you don't need to say this *every single time* you answer an email from arch-dev-public? We do this (restrict who can post to that list) quite on purpose, and this is the defined method of answering these emails. Every dev subscribes to this list too so it isn't like your email is getting lost.
Hi Dan, I didn't know that either. I've several times wanted to reply to arch-dev-public emails and didn't know how. It's helpful to hear this is the expected protocol, thanks.
It used to (not sure if the message has changed) indicate this in the error response when trying to post to arch-dev-public. Something to the effect of "please send your reply to arch-general"
I didn't read this in the arch-dev-public response. Maybe I just missed it. I know that devs who are subscribed to arch-dev-public usually are subscribed to arch-general but I didn't know that this is the expected way to answer. I won't write this comment anymore. ;-) Thanks for the infos. Greetings, Heiko
On Mon, 2010-01-04 at 10:57 -0500, Jim Pryor wrote:
On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 07:52:38AM -0600, Dan McGee wrote:
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 12:35 AM, Heiko Baums <lists@baums-on-web.de> wrote:
I again answer to arch-general due to write permissions.
You realize you don't need to say this *every single time* you answer an email from arch-dev-public? We do this (restrict who can post to that list) quite on purpose, and this is the defined method of answering these emails. Every dev subscribes to this list too so it isn't like your email is getting lost.
Hi Dan, I didn't know that either. I've several times wanted to reply to arch-dev-public emails and didn't know how. It's helpful to hear this is the expected protocol, thanks.
Ditto from me. Thanks for the clarification.
participants (5)
-
Aaron Griffin
-
Dan McGee
-
Heiko Baums
-
Jim Pryor
-
Ng Oon-Ee