[arch-general] Cannot install shaman from AUR
Hi, i am unable to install shaman from AUR via yaourt error is http://pastebin.com/hfG3zEBd Thanks
Shaman is deprecated. Just don't use it anymore. On Sat, 05 Jun 2010 08:07:32 +0300, Madhurya Kakati <mkakati2805@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi, i am unable to install shaman from AUR via yaourt error is http://pastebin.com/hfG3zEB
On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 10:41 AM, xenof0nt <xenof0nt@gmail.com> wrote:
Shaman is deprecated. Just don't use it anymore.
On Sat, 05 Jun 2010 08:07:32 +0300, Madhurya Kakati <mkakati2805@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi, i am unable to install shaman from AUR via yaourt error is http://pastebin.com/hfG3zEB
is there any other option? and please don't tell me to use pacman. I do use it. Just want to try out a graphical frontend.
Madhurya Kakati wrote:
On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 10:41 AM, xenof0nt <xenof0nt@gmail.com> wrote:
Shaman is deprecated. Just don't use it anymore.
On Sat, 05 Jun 2010 08:07:32 +0300, Madhurya Kakati <mkakati2805@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi, i am unable to install shaman from AUR via yaourt error is http://pastebin.com/hfG3zEB
is there any other option? and please don't tell me to use pacman. I do use it. Just want to try out a graphical frontend.
shaman2-svn... Jerome -- mailto:jeberger@free.fr http://jeberger.free.fr Jabber: jeberger@jabber.fr
On 05/06/10 15:28, "Jérôme M. Berger" wrote:
Madhurya Kakati wrote:
On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 10:41 AM, xenof0nt<xenof0nt@gmail.com> wrote:
Shaman is deprecated. Just don't use it anymore.
On Sat, 05 Jun 2010 08:07:32 +0300, Madhurya Kakati<mkakati2805@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi, i am unable to install shaman from AUR via yaourt error is http://pastebin.com/hfG3zEB
is there any other option? and please don't tell me to use pacman. I do use it. Just want to try out a graphical frontend.
shaman2-svn...
Warning! alpha software. Not a god choice for managing your system...
On Sat, 05 Jun 2010 08:24:41 +0300, Madhurya Kakati <mkakati2805@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 10:41 AM, xenof0nt <xenof0nt@gmail.com> wrote:
Shaman is deprecated. Just don't use it anymore.
On Sat, 05 Jun 2010 08:07:32 +0300, Madhurya Kakati <mkakati2805@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi, i am unable to install shaman from AUR via yaourt error is http://pastebin.com/hfG3zEB
is there any other option? and please don't tell me to use pacman. I do use it. Just want to try out a graphical frontend.
Sorry there is no other alternative. The only solution is Shaman2 but currently is in Alpha stage. That means it is highly unstable and dangerous for your system. Arch will never provide a graphical tool for pacman. So if you can't live with this, then change to another distro
On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 7:36 AM, xenof0nt <xenof0nt@gmail.com> wrote:
Sorry there is no other alternative. The only solution is Shaman2 but currently is in Alpha stage. That means it is highly unstable and dangerous for your system. Arch will never provide a graphical tool for pacman. So if you can't live with this, then change to another distro
Never say never. Just curious, where does that come from ? Why couldn't a sufficiently motivated developer write a GUI frontend to libalpm good enough to get it packaged ? This actually happened with shaman, it was packaged in community by the main makepkg developer, Allan !
On Sat 05 Jun 2010 23:05 +0200, Xavier Chantry wrote:
On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 7:36 AM, xenof0nt <xenof0nt@gmail.com> wrote:
Arch will never provide a graphical tool for pacman. So if you can't live with this, then change to another distro
Never say never. Just curious, where does that come from ? Why couldn't a sufficiently motivated developer write a GUI frontend to libalpm good enough to get it packaged ?
At least it'll never be in core. Good enough for me!
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 2:35 AM, Xavier Chantry <chantry.xavier@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 7:36 AM, xenof0nt <xenof0nt@gmail.com> wrote:
Sorry there is no other alternative. The only solution is Shaman2 but currently is in Alpha stage. That means it is highly unstable and dangerous for your system. Arch will never provide a graphical tool for pacman. So if you can't live with this, then change to another distro
Never say never. Just curious, where does that come from ? Why couldn't a sufficiently motivated developer write a GUI frontend to libalpm good enough to get it packaged ? This actually happened with shaman, it was packaged in community by the main makepkg developer, Allan !
Yea. Whats wrong with a GUI frontend? People will use pacman or the frontend- whichever they prefer. I know arch's wants to keep it simple but providing a good frontend in the repos isnt a bad idea.
On 06/06/10 at 06:30am, Madhurya Kakati wrote:
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 2:35 AM, Xavier Chantry <chantry.xavier@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 7:36 AM, xenof0nt <xenof0nt@gmail.com> wrote:
Sorry there is no other alternative. The only solution is Shaman2 but currently is in Alpha stage. That means it is highly unstable and dangerous for your system. Arch will never provide a graphical tool for pacman. So if you can't live with this, then change to another distro
Never say never. Just curious, where does that come from ? Why couldn't a sufficiently motivated developer write a GUI frontend to libalpm good enough to get it packaged ? This actually happened with shaman, it was packaged in community by the main makepkg developer, Allan !
Yea. Whats wrong with a GUI frontend? People will use pacman or the frontend- whichever they prefer. I know arch's wants to keep it simple but providing a good frontend in the repos isnt a bad idea. It's been discussed before and rejected. If you want to know reasons and logic, search the forums or the MLs. No sense in beating a dead horse. --
At Sonntag, 6. Juni 2010 03:13 Daniel J Griffiths (Ghost1227) wrote:
It's been discussed before and rejected. If you want to know reasons and logic, search the forums or the MLs. No sense in beating a dead horse.
In principle this is okay but the question is was this rejected before or after the support for splitted packages in pacman? At example for this a GUI would be even better: pacman -Ss kdeplasma-addons -) If there is a chance that shaman get stable enough to step to extra this would be very nice but it is not a problem if not. See you, Attila
On 06/04/2010 11:36 PM, xenof0nt wrote:
On Sat, 05 Jun 2010 08:24:41 +0300, Madhurya Kakati <mkakati2805@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 10:41 AM, xenof0nt <xenof0nt@gmail.com> wrote:
Shaman is deprecated. Just don't use it anymore.
On Sat, 05 Jun 2010 08:07:32 +0300, Madhurya Kakati <mkakati2805@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi, i am unable to install shaman from AUR via yaourt error is http://pastebin.com/hfG3zEB
is there any other option? and please don't tell me to use pacman. I do use it. Just want to try out a graphical frontend.
Sorry there is no other alternative. The only solution is Shaman2 but currently is in Alpha stage. That means it is highly unstable and dangerous for your system. Arch will never provide a graphical tool for pacman. So if you can't live with this, then change to another distro
What about packagekit? It seemed fairly stable when I tried it (I stopped because it doesn't display messages about packages but I don't if shaman does either).
participants (9)
-
"Jérôme M. Berger"
-
Allan McRae
-
Attila
-
Brendan Long
-
Daniel J Griffiths (Ghost1227)
-
Loui Chang
-
Madhurya Kakati
-
Xavier Chantry
-
xenof0nt