Re: [arch-general] [*] Re: In defense of pacman.static
On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 07:12:55PM +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
ludovic coues wrote:
It's a problem with the default pacman.conf I suppose. By default, pacman is configured to upgrade itself first. If he have upgrade itself, but forget to bring dependencies with it, it's a shame.
I think this is a bug with the FirstSync option in pacman.conf
Its not actually... it is a bug with pacman's deps. It requires libarchive>=2.7.0-2 and not just 2.7.0
Allan
Do I report this bug ? Regards ppk
Piyush P Kurur wrote:
On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 07:12:55PM +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
ludovic coues wrote:
It's a problem with the default pacman.conf I suppose. By default, pacman is configured to upgrade itself first. If he have upgrade itself, but forget to bring dependencies with it, it's a shame.
I think this is a bug with the FirstSync option in pacman.conf
Its not actually... it is a bug with pacman's deps. It requires libarchive>=2.7.0-2 and not just 2.7.0
Do I report this bug ?
It already has been. Allan
participants (2)
-
Allan McRae
-
Piyush P Kurur