[arch-general] Was: Re: duplicate packages ?
Hi, you may directly talk to the maintainer of those 2 packages, to get the quickest answer. As you can read in the comments of the packages in AUR, rb_libtorrent was renamed to libtorrent-rasterbar by it's developers. Maybe they shouldn't be both in [community], but it's the way gcarrier is managing this transition. I suppose rb_libtorrent will dissapear once it's not needed by other packages. Cheers Jaroslav On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 01:21:35AM +0100, ianux wrote:
Hi all,
I was wondering what is the difference between libtorrent-rasterbar and rb_libtorrent, both in community? I don't see any in PKGBUILDs... furthermore, there is no fixboost.patch for libtorrent-rasterbar and an unused gcc4.3.patch for rb_libtorrent in ABS. Are these duplicates or I missed something?
-- radio ianux - http://ianux.fr/
On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 09:00, Jaroslav Lichtblau <tu@dragonlord.cz> wrote:
you may directly talk to the maintainer of those 2 packages, to get the quickest answer. As you can read in the comments of the packages in AUR, rb_libtorrent was renamed to libtorrent-rasterbar by it's developers. Maybe they shouldn't be both in [community], but it's the way gcarrier is managing this transition. I suppose rb_libtorrent will dissapear once it's not needed by other packages. Which was done a few hours ago. Please E-mail me directly when you want to make sure I read something I should :o)
-- Geoffroy Carrier
participants (2)
-
Geoffroy Carrier
-
Jaroslav Lichtblau