[arch-general] libgl conflict with ati-dri, intel-dri, mach64-dri, ...
Guys, On update today of an i686 box, I get the following unresolved error with pacman -Syu: error: failed to prepare transaction (could not satisfy dependencies) :: ati-dri: requires libgl=7.11.2 :: intel-dri: requires libgl=7.11.2 :: mach64-dri: requires libgl=7.11.2 :: mga-dri: requires libgl=7.11.2 :: r128-dri: requires libgl=7.11.2 :: savage-dri: requires libgl=7.11.2 :: sis-dri: requires libgl=7.11.2 :: tdfx-dri: requires libgl=7.11.2 Is this just a timing issue with the dri files? -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.
what drivers are you actually using for X? if it is nvidia, then just remove all the xf86-video drivers (pacman -Qqs xf86-video|sudo pacman -Rns -) otherwise, you should still remove those extra ones any way... On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 06:35:57PM -0500, David C. Rankin wrote:
Guys,
On update today of an i686 box, I get the following unresolved error with pacman -Syu:
error: failed to prepare transaction (could not satisfy dependencies) :: ati-dri: requires libgl=7.11.2 :: intel-dri: requires libgl=7.11.2 :: mach64-dri: requires libgl=7.11.2 :: mga-dri: requires libgl=7.11.2 :: r128-dri: requires libgl=7.11.2 :: savage-dri: requires libgl=7.11.2 :: sis-dri: requires libgl=7.11.2 :: tdfx-dri: requires libgl=7.11.2
Is this just a timing issue with the dri files?
-- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.
On Mon, 26 Mar 2012 01:35:57 +0200, David C. Rankin <drankinatty@suddenlinkmail.com> wrote:
Guys,
On update today of an i686 box, I get the following unresolved error with pacman -Syu:
error: failed to prepare transaction (could not satisfy dependencies) :: ati-dri: requires libgl=7.11.2 :: intel-dri: requires libgl=7.11.2 :: mach64-dri: requires libgl=7.11.2 :: mga-dri: requires libgl=7.11.2 :: r128-dri: requires libgl=7.11.2 :: savage-dri: requires libgl=7.11.2 :: sis-dri: requires libgl=7.11.2 :: tdfx-dri: requires libgl=7.11.2
Is this just a timing issue with the dri files?
Please do at least some research yourself before firing an e-mail to the list, e.g. https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/28938 should have given you a clue on what's going on: some of these *-dri drivers have been dropped, they're not in the repos anymore and they don't work with the current libgl 8.0.2-1. If you do need ati-dri or intel-dri, you can still use them with the current libgl.
On Mon, 26 Mar 2012 14:01:40 +0200 Karol Błażewicz <karol.blazewicz@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, 26 Mar 2012 01:35:57 +0200, David C. Rankin <drankinatty@suddenlinkmail.com> wrote:
Guys,
On update today of an i686 box, I get the following unresolved error with pacman -Syu:
error: failed to prepare transaction (could not satisfy dependencies) :: ati-dri: requires libgl=7.11.2 :: intel-dri: requires libgl=7.11.2 :: mach64-dri: requires libgl=7.11.2 :: mga-dri: requires libgl=7.11.2 :: r128-dri: requires libgl=7.11.2 :: savage-dri: requires libgl=7.11.2 :: sis-dri: requires libgl=7.11.2 :: tdfx-dri: requires libgl=7.11.2
Is this just a timing issue with the dri files?
Please do at least some research yourself before firing an e-mail to the list, e.g. https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/28938 should have given you a clue on what's going on: some of these *-dri drivers have been dropped, they're not in the repos anymore and they don't work with the current libgl 8.0.2-1.
If you do need ati-dri or intel-dri, you can still use them with the current libgl.
In addition, why on earth would you have all *-dri files installed? You don't know your graphics card? -- Leonid Isaev GnuPG key ID: 164B5A6D Key fingerprint: C0DF 20D0 C075 C3F1 E1BE 775A A7AE F6CB 164B 5A6D
On 03/26/2012 07:01 AM, Karol Błażewicz wrote:
Please do at least some research yourself before firing an e-mail to the list, e.g. https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/28938 should have given you a clue on what's going on: some of these *-dri drivers have been dropped, they're not in the repos anymore and they don't work with the current libgl 8.0.2-1.
If you do need ati-dri or intel-dri, you can still use them with the current libgl.
Karol, I checked www.archlinux.com and I checked packages. Usually it is just a timing issue when these things pop up - thus my question "is it just a timing issue?" There are times when any user can miss something in a bug report, etc.. Please don't take that as an open invitation to berate them openly. That is a large part of the reason the Arch list has a negative reputation for being open to users asking for help. There is a fine line between being helpful and being sarcastic. A simple see: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/28938 would have sufficed. I appreciate your help, but I won't, nor should anyone else, tolerate abusive behavior on this list. -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.
participants (4)
-
Daniel Wallace
-
David C. Rankin
-
Karol Błażewicz
-
Leonid Isaev