Re: [arch-general] should imagemagick-doc really be i686/x86_64
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 16:17, Andrea Scarpino <andrea@archlinux.org> wrote:
I am not aware of the package until I saw it listed on the home page of Archlinux today. Just out of curiosity, I skimmed the contents of the package and find out that they are mainly html files. Shouldn't it be "any" rather than i686/x86_64? Should I file a bug report or this is just my ignorance of imagemagick? Cannot be 'any' because it has been merged in imagemagick PKGBUILD and makepkg yet does not support different architectures for splitted packages. (Or maybe
On Thursday 27 January 2011 18:41:58 Auguste Pop wrote: the support is missing in db-scripts).
-- Andrea
Does this mean the new grub2 packages that I (skodabenz) and Ronald (pressh) have worked on, may not show properly in the website? PKGBUILD at http://dl.dropbox.com/u/9710721/grub2_sources/grub2-1.99~rc1-1.src.tar.gz - has grub2-common-{i686,x86_64} and grub2-bios-any grub2-efi-i386-any and makepkg builds fine without any problems. - Keshav
participants (1)
-
KESHAV P.R.