Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] initscripts changes
Thomas Bächler wrote:
I am hacking initscripts and can't quite decide on two issues:
1) I'd like to hardcode /dev/pts/ mounting in rc.sysinit. 2) I'd like to remove the (hardcoded) line /usr/bin/setterm -blank 15 from rc.sysinit.
Can I get opinions on these?
Thomas, Having read your last e-mail you are right, I should have *pointed out* my opinion instead of going omgwtf. The thread resulted in savagery - nowhere near civilized. I apologize for that. I will try and keep my e-mails more professional. Glenn
On Monday 07 April 2008 19:47:26 RedShift wrote:
The thread resulted in savagery - nowhere near civilized. I apologize for that. I will try and keep my e-mails more professional. Right. pretty unprofessional. awkward. Sorry from me too. That doesn't change my opinion but i agree that we won't get anywhere that way.
-- best regards/Mit freundlichen Grüßen Arvid Ephraim Picciani
RedShift schrieb:
Thomas Bächler wrote:
I am hacking initscripts and can't quite decide on two issues:
1) I'd like to hardcode /dev/pts/ mounting in rc.sysinit. 2) I'd like to remove the (hardcoded) line /usr/bin/setterm -blank 15 from rc.sysinit.
Can I get opinions on these?
Thomas,
Having read your last e-mail you are right, I should have *pointed out* my opinion instead of going omgwtf. The thread resulted in savagery - nowhere near civilized. I apologize for that. I will try and keep my e-mails more professional.
Glenn
I said I wouldn't answer anymore to this thread, but now I have to. I am glad this is settled. For what it's worth, this made me thinking about some of our (my) packages and how they conform to the Arch way.
participants (3)
-
Arvid Ephraim Picciani
-
RedShift
-
Thomas Bächler