[arch-general] firefox-i18n
Hello, thanks for fixing firefox (#8780). Could someone of the DEVs also build a fixed package of firefox-i18n (#8786)? Bye Gerhard -- HAL is running Windows...
Am Samstag, 1. Dezember 2007 11:06:37 schrieb Gerhard Brauer:
Hello,
thanks for fixing firefox (#8780).
Could someone of the DEVs also build a fixed package of firefox-i18n (#8786)?
Bye Gerhard
Btw: there is a .11 :-) -- archlinux.de
Gerhard Brauer schrieb:
Hello,
thanks for fixing firefox (#8780).
Could someone of the DEVs also build a fixed package of firefox-i18n (#8786)?
Bye Gerhard
http://cvs.archlinux.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/i18n/firefox-i18n/PKGBUILD.diff?r1=1.12&r2=1.13&cvsroot=Extra I am really confused about that, alex seems to have changed the path when updating it.
Gruesse! * Thomas Bächler <thomas@archlinux.org> schrieb am [01.12.07 16:00]:
Gerhard Brauer schrieb:
Hello,
thanks for fixing firefox (#8780).
Could someone of the DEVs also build a fixed package of firefox-i18n (#8786)?
Bye Gerhard
http://cvs.archlinux.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/i18n/firefox-i18n/PKGBUILD.diff?r1=1.12&r2=1.13&cvsroot=Extra I am really confused about that, alex seems to have changed the path when updating it.
Yeah, the problem in 1.13 is: install -D -m 644 chrome.manifest ${startdir}/pkg/usr/opt/mozilla/lib/firefox-${pkgver}/chrome/${lang}.manifest || return 1 It's the /usr/opt/mozilla path, should be /opt/mozilla Bye Gerhard -- Schlagt den Raab!
On Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 04:00:42PM +0100, Thomas Bächler wrote:
Gerhard Brauer schrieb:
Hello,
thanks for fixing firefox (#8780).
Could someone of the DEVs also build a fixed package of firefox-i18n (#8786)?
Bye Gerhard
http://cvs.archlinux.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/i18n/firefox-i18n/PKGBUILD.diff?r1=1.12&r2=1.13&cvsroot=Extra I am really confused about that, alex seems to have changed the path when updating it.
Didn't Alex already explain it for firefox? http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2007-November/003402.html If I understood correctly, it's when he was reverting these changes that something went wrong, which resulted in the broken -2 firefox package. Now, he apparently just forgot to revert it for firefox-i18n as well.
Gruesse! * Thomas Bächler <thomas@archlinux.org> schrieb am [01.12.07 16:00]:
Gerhard Brauer schrieb:
Could someone of the DEVs also build a fixed package of firefox-i18n (#8786)?
I am really confused about that, alex seems to have changed the path when updating it.
Sorry, it's me again ;-) At the risk that i'm bothersome, but is it so complex to build a fixed language package for FF? Some users have build meanwhile their own fixed package. In my opinion this was *our* bug, selfmade ;-) What is the impression if we don't fix it as quick as the fault happened? Bye Gerhard -- archlinux.de
participants (4)
-
Gerhard Brauer
-
Pierre Schmitz
-
Thomas Bächler
-
Xavier