[arch-general] sysdig downgraded without adding a new era?
Anybody else got a "warning: sysdig: local (0.15.1-1) is newer than community (0.15.0-2)" ?
On Tue, 25 Apr 2017 02:06:59 +0200, Neven Sajko via arch-general wrote:
Anybody else got a "warning: sysdig: local (0.15.1-1) is newer than community (0.15.0-2)" ?
Hi, downgrades happen from time to time. From official repositories I manually downgraded [2017-04-25 01:22] [ALPM] downgraded openimageio (1.7.13-1 -> 1.7.10-2) today. But I'm pissed off by this automatic downgrade [2017-04-25 02:09] [ALPM] downgraded pulseaudio (2013.08.18-1 -> 10.0-3) from an empty dummy package to the version from official repositories. Just because the pulseaudio-bluetooth package has got the version included to the dependency and I missed it within 260 upgrades. [rocketmouse@archlinux ~]$ sudo pacman -U /var/cache/aur/current/pulseaudio-2013.08.18-1-any.pkg.tar.xz loading packages... resolving dependencies... looking for conflicting packages... error: failed to prepare transaction (could not satisfy dependencies) :: pulseaudio-bluetooth: installing pulseaudio (2013.08.18-1) breaks dependency 'pulseaudio=10.0-3' Fortunately I can safely remove this odd package, I don't ned anything of this dependency chain. To avoid such an issue in the future, I'll add all dummy packages (just pulseaudio and gvfs) to the ignore list. [rocketmouse@archlinux ~]$ pactree -r pulseaudio-bluetooth pulseaudio-bluetooth └─gnome-bluetooth [rocketmouse@archlinux ~]$ pactree -r gnome-bluetooth gnome-bluetooth [rocketmouse@archlinux ~]$ sudo pacman -Rs {pulseaudio,gnome}-bluetooth [snip] Packages (3) bluez-5.44-1 gnome-bluetooth-3.20.1+1+ge902d1a-1 pulseaudio-bluetooth-10.0-3 Regards, Ralf
On 04/24/2017 08:41 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
downgrades happen from time to time.
When they do, it is a bug. Why on earth do you think epoch exists anyway? Note: custom packages are tangential to this thread, please vent elsewhere. -- Eli Schwartz
On Mon, 24 Apr 2017 21:03:36 -0400, Eli Schwartz via arch-general wrote:
On 04/24/2017 08:41 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
downgrades happen from time to time.
When they do, it is a bug. Why on earth do you think epoch exists anyway?
They might happen unintended, but all downgrades from official repositories I experienced worked. However, I didn't report a bug, openimageio 1.7.13-2 is already in community. https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/openimageio/
please vent elsewhere
:D Have you ever considered to make use of professional psychological help? Nearly each of your replies, whomsoever you answer, has got a condescending tone. It's funny for the reader, if you make a fool of yourself, but I suspect being that instable must be a pain for you.
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 9:39 AM, Ralf Mardorf
Have you ever considered to make use of professional psychological help? Nearly each of your replies, whomsoever you answer, has got a condescending tone. It's funny for the reader, if you make a fool of yourself, but I suspect being that instable must be a pain for you.
That is out of line, not just for this mailing list but for any public civil discussion. Especially from yourself, as from certain perspectives the paragraph above may apply to you as well, to a degree. Take it to private mails if you need to.
On 04/24/2017 08:06 PM, Neven Sajko via arch-general wrote:
Anybody else got a "warning: sysdig: local (0.15.1-1) is newer than community (0.15.0-2)" ?
File a bugreport, the version in staging/testing (which was part of the openssl 1.1 rebuild) was older than the new version which was pushed to community... but not rebuilt for openssl 1.1 in testing at the same time. This occasionally happens by accident during large rebuilds, as soon as the maintainer becomes aware he will certainly push 0.15.1-2 to fix it. :) -- Eli Schwartz
participants (4)
-
Eli Schwartz
-
Neven Sajko
-
Oon-Ee Ng
-
Ralf Mardorf