man.archlinux.org/man/xzmore.1.uk is not in English
https://man.archlinux.org/man/xzmore.1.uk manual page is not in English. Visually, I would say my local copy, man -l /usr/share/man/uk/man1/xzmore.1.gz , and xzmore.1.uk at man.archlinux.org have the same text. I also have many warnings, for a lot of packages, from pacman -Qkk. One of these warnings is about /usr/share/man/uk/man1/xzmore.1.gz. The warning is despite the fact the actaul data for /usr/share/man/uk/man1/xzmore.1.gz seems to agree with zgreping /var/lib/pacman/local/xz-5.6.1-2/mtree for that file. Local pacman version is 6.0.2-9. -- u34
Ey, The English version is at https://man.archlinux.org/man/xzmore.1 You're purposefully looking at the uk, a.k.a. Ukrainian, version. -- Cheers, Aᴀʀᴏɴ
On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 11:37 PM
https://man.archlinux.org/man/xzmore.1.uk manual page is not in English. Visually, I would say my local copy, man -l /usr/share/man/uk/man1/xzmore.1.gz , and xzmore.1.uk at man.archlinux.org have the same text. I also have many warnings, for a lot of packages, from pacman -Qkk. One of these warnings is about /usr/share/man/uk/man1/xzmore.1.gz. The warning is despite the fact the actaul data for /usr/share/man/uk/man1/xzmore.1.gz seems to agree with zgreping /var/lib/pacman/local/xz-5.6.1-2/mtree for that file. Local pacman version is 6.0.2-9.
-- u34
Isn't 'uk' the Ukrainian language code? If you're expecting English from United Kingdom, you might be looking for 'en_GB' https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ukrainian_language
I'm pretty sure most man pages don't have a special version for a different English dialect anyway. Also, have you any idea what OP means about the hash mismatch? -- Cheers, Aᴀʀᴏɴ
Aaron Liu
I'm pretty sure most man pages don't have a special version for a different English dialect anyway.
Also, have you any idea what OP means about the hash mismatch?
-- Cheers, Aᴀʀᴏɴ
Hello, I was unaware, or completely confused, about language code vs country code. As for pacman: ============== I didn't -Qkk for a long time. Years ago, -Qkk gave the expected results. Tried yesterday for the first time since then. I do get many warnings. Superficially, that could be tied to xz 5.6.1-1 -> 5.6.1-2. Used the word superficially because it is only a hunch. No concrete evidence for the tie. I am not sure if since yesterday, or maybe for only 2 or 3 days, pacman 6.0.2-9 behaves differently then before. I will have to further test it. While writing about pacman, and without the -debug package/coredump analisys, my problem with 6.0.3-1 is: It could be you can reproduce the issue by youself. After upgrading pacman 6.0.2-9 -> 6.1.0-3. # pacman -Sw abc ... error: segmentation fault Please submit a full bug report with --debug if appropriate. Segmentation fault (core dumped) abc, System for Sequential Logic Synthesis and Formal Verification, is a real package. It is just an example here. In the past, downgrading to 6.0.2-9 eliminated the issue. I am not sure that statement is now correct. That is why I wrote in the prevoius section that I will have to further test it. It could be worth pointing out that: 1. The package seems to be downloaded successfuly. pacman -U can install it. Which makes me think the segfault is somewhwre after downloading. 2. Signature, .sig, file was not downloaded. I believe this is the usual case here. 3. pacman.conf is using XferCommand = /usr/bin/curl --socks5-hostname IP:PORT --silent --show-error --continue-at - --fail-early --fail --output %o %u Using what looks to me a similar command from the shell for the sig succeeds. 4. After the sigfault, the lock file is not removed automatically. -- u34
participants (3)
-
Aaron Liu
-
Rafael Fontenelle
-
u34＠net9.cf